[PATCH v1 1/2] dt-binding: pinctrl: Add NPCM8XX pinctrl and GPIO documentation
Tomer Maimon
tmaimon77 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 23:29:38 AEST 2022
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your comments.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 12:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2022 12:21, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Added device tree binding documentation for Nuvoton Arbel BMC NPCM8XX
> > pinmux and GPIO controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > .../pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml | 205 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 205 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6395ef2bf5b3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Nuvoton NPCM845 Pin Controller and GPIO
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77 at gmail.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + The Nuvoton BMC NPCM8XX Pin Controller multi-function routed through
> > + the multiplexing block, Each pin supports GPIO functionality (GPIOx)
> > + and multiple functions that directly connect the pin to different
> > + hardware blocks.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl
> > +
> > + ranges:
> > + maxItems: 1
>
> ranges without reg? Does it even work? Did you test the bindings?
The ranges related to GPIO node reg
I did test the pin controller document and it passed.
bash-4.2$ make ARCH=arm64 dt_binding_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.yaml
LINT Documentation/devicetree/bindings
CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.example.dts
DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.example.dtb
CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl.example.dtb
Did I need to run anything else than dt_binding_check for testing the document?
>
> > +
> > + '#address-cells':
> > + const: 1
> > +
> > + '#size-cells':
> > + const: 1
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^gpio@":
> > + type: object
> > +
> > + description:
> > + Eight GPIO banks that each contain between 32 GPIOs.
> > +
> > + properties:
> > +
>
> No blank line.
O.K.
>
> > + gpio-controller: true
> > +
> > + '#gpio-cells':
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + interrupts:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + gpio-ranges:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - gpio-controller
> > + - '#gpio-cells'
> > + - reg
> > + - interrupts
> > + - gpio-ranges
> > +
> > + "-pin":
> > + $ref: pinmux-node.yaml#
>
> Shouldn't this be under bank?
Do you mean after the group and function properties?
The -pin shouldn't use for the group property naming?
>
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + groups:
> > + description:
> > + One or more groups of pins to mux to a certain function
> > + items:
> > + enum: [ iox1, iox2, smb1d, smb2d, lkgpo1, lkgpo2, ioxh, gspi,
> > + smb5b, smb5c, lkgpo0, pspi2, jm1, jm2, smb4den, smb4b,
> > + smb4c, smb15, smb16, smb17, smb18, smb19, smb20, smb21,
> > + smb22, smb23, smb4d, smb14, smb5, smb4, smb3, spi0cs1,
> > + spi0cs2, spi0cs3, smb3c, smb3b, bmcuart0a, uart1, jtag2,
> > + bmcuart1, uart2, bmcuart0b, r1err, r1md, r1oen, r2oen,
> > + rmii3, r3oen, smb3d, fanin0, fanin1, fanin2, fanin3, fanin4,
> > + fanin5, fanin6, fanin7, fanin8, fanin9, fanin10, fanin11,
> > + fanin12, fanin13, fanin14, fanin15, pwm0, pwm1, pwm2, pwm3,
> > + r2, r2err, r2md, r3rxer, ga20kbc, smb5d, lpc, espi, rg1,
> > + rg1mdio, rg2, ddr, i3c0, i3c1, i3c2, i3c3, i3c4, i3c5,
> > + smb0, smb1, smb2, smb2c, smb2b, smb1c, smb1b, smb8, smb9,
> > + smb10, smb11, sd1, sd1pwr, pwm4, pwm5, pwm6, pwm7, pwm8,
> > + pwm9, pwm10, pwm11, mmc8, mmc, mmcwp, mmccd, mmcrst, clkout,
> > + serirq, lpcclk, scipme, sci, smb6, smb7, spi1, faninx, r1,
> > + spi3, spi3cs1, spi3quad, spi3cs2, spi3cs3, nprd_smi, smb0b,
> > + smb0c, smb0den, smb0d, ddc, rg2mdio, wdog1, wdog2, smb12,
> > + smb13, spix, spixcs1, clkreq, hgpio0, hgpio1, hgpio2, hgpio3,
> > + hgpio4, hgpio5, hgpio6, hgpio7 ]
> > +
> > + function:
> > + description:
> > + The function that a group of pins is muxed to
> > + enum: [ iox1, iox2, smb1d, smb2d, lkgpo1, lkgpo2, ioxh, gspi,
> > + smb5b, smb5c, lkgpo0, pspi2, jm1, jm2, smb4den, smb4b,
> > + smb4c, smb15, smb16, smb17, smb18, smb19, smb20, smb21,
> > + smb22, smb23, smb4d, smb14, smb5, smb4, smb3, spi0cs1,
> > + spi0cs2, spi0cs3, smb3c, smb3b, bmcuart0a, uart1, jtag2,
> > + bmcuart1, uart2, bmcuart0b, r1err, r1md, r1oen, r2oen,
> > + rmii3, r3oen, smb3d, fanin0, fanin1, fanin2, fanin3, fanin4,
> > + fanin5, fanin6, fanin7, fanin8, fanin9, fanin10, fanin11,
> > + fanin12, fanin13, fanin14, fanin15, pwm0, pwm1, pwm2, pwm3,
> > + r2, r2err, r2md, r3rxer, ga20kbc, smb5d, lpc, espi, rg1,
> > + rg1mdio, rg2, ddr, i3c0, i3c1, i3c2, i3c3, i3c4, i3c5,
> > + smb0, smb1, smb2, smb2c, smb2b, smb1c, smb1b, smb8, smb9,
> > + smb10, smb11, sd1, sd1pwr, pwm4, pwm5, pwm6, pwm7, pwm8,
> > + pwm9, pwm10, pwm11, mmc8, mmc, mmcwp, mmccd, mmcrst, clkout,
> > + serirq, lpcclk, scipme, sci, smb6, smb7, spi1, faninx, r1,
> > + spi3, spi3cs1, spi3quad, spi3cs2, spi3cs3, nprd_smi, smb0b,
> > + smb0c, smb0den, smb0d, ddc, rg2mdio, wdog1, wdog2, smb12,
> > + smb13, spix, spixcs1, clkreq, hgpio0, hgpio1, hgpio2, hgpio3,
> > + hgpio4, hgpio5, hgpio6, hgpio7 ]
> > +
> > + dependencies:
> > + groups: [ function ]
> > + function: [ groups ]
> > +
> > + additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > + "^pin":
>
> This is almost the same as previous property. Confusing and I think it
> does not work.
if I remove it I get the following error:
pinctrl at f0800000: 'pin34-slew' does not match any of the regexes:
'-pin', '^gpio@', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Can you advise what I should do?
>
> > + $ref: pincfg-node.yaml#
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + pins:
> > + description:
> > + A list of pins to configure in certain ways, such as enabling
> > + debouncing
> > +
> > + bias-disable: true
> > +
> > + bias-pull-up: true
> > +
> > + bias-pull-down: true
> > +
> > + input-enable: true
> > +
> > + output-low: true
> > +
> > + output-high: true
> > +
> > + drive-push-pull: true
> > +
> > + drive-open-drain: true
> > +
> > + input-debounce:
> > + description:
> > + Debouncing periods in microseconds, one period per interrupt
> > + bank found in the controller
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 4
> > +
> > + slew-rate:
> > + description: |
> > + 0: Low rate
> > + 1: High rate
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > + enum: [0, 1]
> > +
> > + drive-strength:
> > + enum: [ 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 ]
> > +
> > + additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - ranges
> > + - '#address-cells'
> > + - '#size-cells'
>
> Missing allOf with ref to pinctrl.yaml.
Do you mean adding
allOf:
- $ref: "pinctrl.yaml#"
>
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +
> > + soc {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + pinctrl: pinctrl at f0800000 {
> > + compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-pinctrl";
> > + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0xf0010000 0x8000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + gpio0: gpio at f0010000 {
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + reg = <0x0 0xB0>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 116 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 0 32>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + fanin0_pin: fanin0-pin {
> > + groups = "fanin0";
> > + function = "fanin0";
> > + };
> > +
> > + pin34_slew: pin34-slew {
>
> and how does it pass your checks?
Yes
>
> Did you test the bindings?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards,
Tomer
More information about the openbmc
mailing list