[PATCH 0/7] tpm: Pull tpm_tis_phy_ops and tpm_tis_i2c updates
Peter Delevoryas
peter at pjd.dev
Sat Aug 20 02:18:48 AEST 2022
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:18:00PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> sorry for the late response.
No problem! We unblocked our development on this issue by just disabling
the TPM I2C driver in our kernel config, so there's no particular rush
for us.
In fact, if Joel wants to just avoid figuring this out and merge the
5.19 kernel, that would probably be fine. But, that might still break
the machines he referenced, that are using an I2C TPM interface.
>
> On 09.08.22 00:08, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
> > Alexander didn't include the compatible strings from the old driver,
> > even though it should be compatible, so I've included a patch at the end
> > which fixes that. I did it as a separate patch so that we maintain a
> > patch series closer to what the upstream will be.
>
> There were some objections to add them and/or to document them in
> trivial-devices.yaml, so I left them out to get at least the driver code
> merged. Makes sense to add them back if they are already in use.
I see, thanks for explaining the context.
>
> I still plan to clean up the TPM compatibles and their documentation, to
> make it easier to manage them in the future, and then also add back the
> missing compatibles.
Oh that would be great, thanks.
>
> > cc'ing Alexander on this thread too to see if he has any suggestions, or
> > thinks I missed anything.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Alexander
More information about the openbmc
mailing list