[External] Re: New test for patches in openbmc/openbmc

Lei Yu yulei.sh at bytedance.com
Tue Sep 28 18:36:25 AEST 2021


> > I have a similar case.
> > As an x86 system, some of the recipes/changes are referenced from
> > Intel-BMC, which is not upstreamed.
> > Currently, we had patches related to UART routing and
> > phosphor-node-manager-proxy.
> > The UART routing patches are being upstreamed thanks to Troy.
> > The change to node-manager is related to the HW design difference, and
> > due to the fact that phosphor-node-manager-proxy is in Intel-BMC, we
> > can not really make the patch upstream.
>
> I'm not following why that's preventing upstreaming.  If
> node-manager-proxy is something you need on your systems, I don't see
> a reason why we would avoid cleaning it up and upstreaming it, but I
> have no details on what this patch is, or what it does, so it's really
> hard to talk in concrete terms about how to proceed next.

node-manager-proxy is in Intel-BMC, so we really need Intel to
upstream it into openbmc.

-- 
BRs,
Lei YU


More information about the openbmc mailing list