[PATCH 1/9] sysfs: add sysfs_remove_bin_file_self() function
Greg Kroah-Hartman
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Oct 7 17:12:37 AEDT 2021
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:58:59PM -0700, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:23:33PM PDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 05:09:46PM -0700, Zev Weiss wrote:
> > > This is simply the bin_attribute analog to sysfs_remove_file_self().
> >
> > No, no binary sysfs file should be triggering a remove.
> >
> > binary sysfs files are "pass-through-only" from userspace to hardware,
> > the kernel should not be even knowing what is read/written to them.
> >
> > What do you think this is needed for?
> >
>
> So, I initially set out to be able to activate/deactivate specific DT nodes
> at runtime by using the device-tree "reserved" status as defined in the spec
> (but not currently used anywhere in the kernel) to mean essentially "create
> a device for this but don't bind a driver to it" (leaving it to userspace to
> invoke bind/unbind or similar), and added initial support for the specific
> driver I'm concerned with at the moment (aspeed-smc) -- that was the
> previous patch series linked in the cover letter of this one.
>
> In the discussion of that series, Rob suggested as an alternate approach:
>
> > Another possibility is making 'status' writeable from userspace. It is
> > just a sysfs file.
>
> That seemed sort of appealing to me, and this seemed like the most obvious
> way to go about implementing it. Given that DT properties are binary
> attributes, I gather you'd consider that a non-starter though?
Why would a text attribute of "status" be a binary sysfs file? That
feels really wrong as again, binary sysfs files are not supposed to be
parsed or handled by the kernel at all, they are only a pass-through.
thanks,
greg k-h
More information about the openbmc
mailing list