[PATCH 11/13] arm: npcm: drop selecting non-existing ARM_ERRATA_794072

Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 23:14:58 AEDT 2021


On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:11 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:31 AM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:36 AM Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 14:57, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:19 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/6be32e0b5b454ed7b609317266a8e798@BLUPR03MB358.namprd03.prod.outlook.com/
> > >
> > > It looks like it's the same workaround as ARM_ERRATA_742230, which the
> > > kernel does implement.
> > >
> > > It would be good to hear from the Nuvoton people, or an Arm person.
> >
> > I will happily update the patch to select ARM_ERRATA_742230 instead of
> > the dead non-existing ARM_ERRATA_794072.
> >
> > In contrast to the current patch that basically only cleans up "dead
> > config" and has no effective functional change, the new patch would
> > change the behaviour. I cannot test this patch (beyond some basic
> > compile test) on the hardware; so, we certainly need someone to have
> > that hardware, knows how to test it or confirm otherwise that we
> > should select the ARM_ERRATA_742230 fix for this hardware.
> >
> > The current patch should be subsumed by the new patch; the submission
> > of the new patch is deferred until that person shows up. Let's see.
>
> I'd prefer to leave the broken Kconfig symbol in place as a reminder until it
> gets fixed properly then.
>

Agree, this patch here should not be integrated. I rather expect that
Avi or others at Nuvoton will provide a proper patch to act
appropriately for the ARM_ERRATA_794072, or after proper analysis can
determine that there is no change in the kernel required.

Lukas


More information about the openbmc mailing list