[PATCH v2 2/2] serial: 8250: Use BIT(x) for UART_{CAP,BUG}_*
Jiri Slaby
jirislaby at kernel.org
Wed May 19 16:32:13 AEST 2021
On 19. 05. 21, 8:27, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2021, at 15:44, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 19. 05. 21, 2:07, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>>> BIT(x) improves readability and safety with respect to shifts.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
>>> index 34aa2714f3c9..4fbf1088fad8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>> * Copyright (C) 2001 Russell King.
>>> */
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>> #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
>>> #include <linux/serial_reg.h>
>>> #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>>> @@ -70,25 +71,25 @@ struct serial8250_config {
>>> unsigned int flags;
>>> };
>>>
>>> -#define UART_CAP_FIFO (1 << 8) /* UART has FIFO */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_EFR (1 << 9) /* UART has EFR */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_SLEEP (1 << 10) /* UART has IER sleep */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_AFE (1 << 11) /* MCR-based hw flow control */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_UUE (1 << 12) /* UART needs IER bit 6 set (Xscale) */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_RTOIE (1 << 13) /* UART needs IER bit 4 set (Xscale, Tegra) */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_HFIFO (1 << 14) /* UART has a "hidden" FIFO */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_RPM (1 << 15) /* Runtime PM is active while idle */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_IRDA (1 << 16) /* UART supports IrDA line discipline */
>>> -#define UART_CAP_MINI (1 << 17) /* Mini UART on BCM283X family lacks:
>>> +#define UART_CAP_FIFO BIT(8) /* UART has FIFO */
>>> +#define UART_CAP_EFR BIT(9) /* UART has EFR */
>>> +#define UART_CAP_SLEEP BIT(10) /* UART has IER sleep */
>>
>>
>> Perfect, except the include: BIT is not defined in bitops.h, but in
>> bits.h (which includes vdso/bits.h). In fact, bitops.h includes bits.h
>> too, but it's superfluous to include all those bitops.
>
> Maybe the recommendation in the checkpatch documentation should be
> fixed then?
+1 since:
commit 8bd9cb51daac89337295b6f037b0486911e1b408
Author: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
Date: Tue Jun 19 13:53:08 2018 +0100
locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from
<linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file
So care to fix checkpatch too :)?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
More information about the openbmc
mailing list