CI build for quanta/gbs

[Brandon Kim]

Hi Andrew,

Do you mind kicking off the docker build again for gbs? It looks like sslh
bump may have  been needed from meta-google
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/openbmc/+/43015

Thanks,
Brandon

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 11:26 AM Andrew Geissler <geissonator at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On May 7, 2021, at 2:10 AM, George Hung (洪忠敬) <George.Hung at quantatw.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> We already fix the patch error for phosphor-hwmon, could you help proceed
> to join the quanta/gbs to CI build ?
>
>
> Hey George, I’ve added it to our daily build, it’s still not passing for
> gbs though. Please take a look at
> https://jenkins.openbmc.org/job/latest-master/233/label=docker-builder,target=gbs/
>
>
> Once I see that daily job pass I’ll add it to our official CI job.
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards
> George Hung
>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> It looks like it's due to my patch to phosphor-hwmon (which, the repo is
> going through some overhaul and is causing conflicts with). The patch in
> question is in the process of getting upstreamed and the repo is settling
> down, so I'll ping you on Discord once it looks ready to be tried again
> (hopefully by end of the week).
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:38 AM Andrew Geissler <geissonator at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On May 5, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Brandon Kim <brandonkim at google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> `gbs` machine will provide meta-google coverage, so it would be great if
> `gbs` could be added in addition to `gsj` instead of as a replacement.
>
> Is there a shortage of OpenBMC CI nodes by any chance? Google has been
> providing 2 of the OpenBMC CI nodes, so it would be great if adding `gbs`
> could count towards one of those CI nodes.
>
>
> Yep, google donates two servers so sounds good. I added it to our daily
> build of master and it looks like it hit a build issue. We can coordinate
> in discord if you like but once we get this figured out, I’ll add it to the
> main openbmc/openbmc CI job.
>
>
> https://jenkins.openbmc.org/job/latest-master/231/label=docker-builder,target=gbs/console
> <https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjenkins.openbmc.org%2Fjob%2Flatest-master%2F231%2Flabel%3Ddocker-builder%2Ctarget%3Dgbs%2Fconsole&data=04%7C01%7CGeorge.Hung%40quantatw.com%7C5daa46384b4e4cebf7f908d910a4efb6%7C179b032707fc4973ac738de7313561b2%7C1%7C0%7C637559122843370643%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=uFv0h2aHwSVlOU6o330pT9hnRO9i5fYc21nUH1Y3ly4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:54 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 6:25 AM Andrew Geissler <geissonator at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 5, 2021, at 1:26 AM, George Hung (洪忠敬) <
> George.Hung at quantatw.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew Geissler,
> > >
> > > We have ported many OpenBMC features to quanta/gbs machine (Nuvoton
> BMC platform) and hope it could be added to CI build, could you help add
> quanta/gbs machine to CI build verification ? (I'm not familiar with this,
> if there's anything we need to do first, please let us know)
> >
> > Hey George,
> >
> > Getting a new system into CI doesn’t have the most defined process but
> > I think in general it has to fall under one of these due to our
> constraints
> > in compute power for CI:
> >
> > 1) Propose an existing system in CI to replace (and the benefits of that)
> > 2) Donate a jenkins compute node to openbmc CI
> > 3) Convince the community that your system provides additional meta-*
> >     layer coverage (or some other critical benefit) that would be worth
> >     the additional hit to the existing CI infrastructure.
> >
> > We currently have a “gsj” system in CI. Would it make sense to replace
> > it with this new “gbs” machine?
>
> Jumping on this thread to say that I'm hoping to have quanta-gbs
> support in upstream qemu shortly --- so we could also enable this as a
> Qemu CI machine.
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > George Hung
> > >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20210507/75699141/attachment-0001.htm>