D-bus model proposal for pay for access features

[Ratan Gupta]

Hi All,

I would like to introduce a dbus model proposal around pay for access
features.Normally IBM system ships with more hardware than was
purchased, which can be unlocked later.

Features could be 1) AIX enabled/disabled
2) How many processors are enabled
3) How much memory is enabled

*Proposed Model:*

The model consists of following main entities:1 - licenses - these
objects represents the features.  There will be a license represnting
feature(one is to one relation ship) and these objects have state -
active, inactive, unknown, etc.
These objects could implement the Delete interface for when a client
wishes to disable the license/feature.

2 - manager - the manager object (distinct from freedesktop object
manager) provides a method
interface to create new license objects.

*Alternate Dbus Model:*

1 - Licenses: these objects represent an agreement.  These objects have an
association to one or more features, and these objects have state -
active,inactive, unknown, etc.
These objects could implement the Delete interface for when a client
wishes to disable the license.

2 - Features: these objects describe the features available.
Feature objects would be static and implementation/platform defined.
A BMC or host firmware update
could potentially add or remove the available features exposed as dbus
objects.  At the moment the
only feature attribute I can think of is a name and the feature status.

3 Manager - the manager object (distinct from freedesktop object manager)
provides a method interface to create new license objects.

The difference between two models areIn the alternate Dbus model we
are keeping the feature Dbus object and the License have an associated
features
In the proposed model we are only keeping the license D-bus object
which represent the feature.

Flow would be as below with the proposed model -1/ Manager object
would be having interface like upload (License activation key)
2/ On IBM systems we send this key to the host firmware which
activates the features
3/ Host Firmware sends the activated feature list to the BMC
4/ BMC creates the licenses for the activated features

I suspect an implementation of the above flow is highly IBM specific,
but I hope some of you have some feedback that might enable some
collaboration.
If not - where should we put this application?

Ratan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20210430/4cc42071/attachment.htm>