Intel-ipmi-oem repo

[Lei Yu]

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:20 PM chunhui.jia
<chunhui.jia at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> You use both fixed sensor and dynamic sensors?

Not exactly.
We use "dynamic sensors" created by entity-manager/dbus-sensors on DBus;
We use "fixed sensors" with phosphor-host-ipmid defined in yaml.

>
> 发件人：Lei Yu <yulei.sh at bytedance.com>
> 发送时间：2021-01-15 10:23
> 主题：Re: Intel-ipmi-oem repo
> 收件人："Vernon Mauery"<vernon.mauery at linux.intel.com>
> 抄送："Willy Tu"<wltu at google.com>,"OpenBMC Maillist"<openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org>,"chunhui.jia"<chunhui.jia at linux.intel.com>,"Ed Tanous"<edtanous at google.com>,"Brad Bishop"<bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com>,"apparao.puli"<apparao.puli at linux.intel.com>,"Vijay Khemka"<vijaykhemka at fb.com>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:23 AM Vernon Mauery
> <vernon.mauery at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > I would say that if IBM is the only company using the sensor
> > implementation that is currently in ipmid, it would be best to move it
> > to the IBM OEM layer. But it is difficult in a project this size who is
> > using what. So leaving it in ipmid for now is fine.
> >
>
> This is not the case. Bytedance uses ipmid with fixed yaml as well.
> In our case, we have all the sensors on DBus created by
> entity-manager/dbus-sensors, and only part of them are necessary for
> ipmi.
> So we specifically define the necessary sensors (and
> inventory-sensors) in yaml and use the current ipmid to implement
> them.
>
> AFAIK Yadro and Ampere uses ipmid with fixed yaml too.
>
> --
> BRs,
> Lei YU



-- 
BRs,
Lei YU