Intel-ipmi-oem repo

Brad Bishop bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com
Fri Jan 15 06:40:26 AEDT 2021


On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:38:05AM -0800, Vernon Mauery wrote:
>On 14-Jan-2021 08:38 AM, Ed Tanous wrote:

>>Would people prefer it to be a package config on IPMID to select between
>>the two implementations?
>
>I don't have a problem with a package config to select sensor 
>implementations.

This seems fine to me too.  I looked and there are non-POWER users of 
the fixed sensor id implementation too so openpower-ipmi-oem probably 
doesn't make good sense.

>I would say that if IBM is the only company using the sensor 
>implementation that is currently in ipmid, it would be best to move it 
>to the IBM OEM layer. But it is difficult in a project this size who 
>is using what.

'grep yaml-config' of the openbmc tree gives a pretty decent indicator 
of who is using the fixed sensor ID implementation.

-brad


More information about the openbmc mailing list