Intel-ipmi-oem repo
Brad Bishop
bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com
Fri Jan 15 06:40:26 AEDT 2021
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:38:05AM -0800, Vernon Mauery wrote:
>On 14-Jan-2021 08:38 AM, Ed Tanous wrote:
>>Would people prefer it to be a package config on IPMID to select between
>>the two implementations?
>
>I don't have a problem with a package config to select sensor
>implementations.
This seems fine to me too. I looked and there are non-POWER users of
the fixed sensor id implementation too so openpower-ipmi-oem probably
doesn't make good sense.
>I would say that if IBM is the only company using the sensor
>implementation that is currently in ipmid, it would be best to move it
>to the IBM OEM layer. But it is difficult in a project this size who
>is using what.
'grep yaml-config' of the openbmc tree gives a pretty decent indicator
of who is using the fixed sensor ID implementation.
-brad
More information about the openbmc
mailing list