any in-progress Redfish TelemetryService enhancements?

Grobelny, Krzysztof krzysztof.grobelny at linux.intel.com
Wed Apr 28 19:41:44 AEST 2021


Hello,

Our current plan looks like this:

Completing outgoing review in bmcweb for telemetry:
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/33363 
<https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/33363>
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/38798/27 
<https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/38798/27>
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/41813/1 
<https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/41813/1>

With start of July will finish work on features already started and fix 
know issues, then we will start working on "Append".
By currently ongoing feature I mean Triggers and Aggregation functions, 
review below doesn't cover everything we need to implement:
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/telemetry/+/41064 
<https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/telemetry/+/41064>, 
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/telemetry/+/40941 
<https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/telemetry/+/40941>, 
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/telemetry/+/41678 
<https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/telemetry/+/41678>

My estimate is that we will deliver "Append" in Q4 2021.

Best regards,
Krzysztof Grobelny

On 2021-04-28 04:15, George Liu wrote:
> Hi All:
> Around Telemetry(Support AppendWrapsWhenFull):
> I added a new interface and merged:
> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-dbus-interfaces/+/41010
>
> So, @Wludzik, Wonder if there is a plan to implement it?
> If Yes, Could you share the time cut-off point?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> George Liu
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:47 PM Brad Bishop
> <bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:12:39AM -0800, Ed Tanous wrote:
>>
>>> It would be really helpful if you could add your input and participate
>>> in the reviews.  In this specific case, I recall pointing out the
>>> missing Min/Max/Average aggregations (from the first bug) in one of
>>> the original telemetry code reviews.  I don't remember what the answer
>>> was there, but I don't think it got added.  I don't think append
>>> behavior has come up, but I suspect it would've changed some of the
>>> initial design if we had known it was desired.
>> FWIW this interest in the telemetry work has only emerged very recently
>> (around when I sent the first mail in this thread).
>>
>> -brad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20210428/edf22994/attachment.htm>


More information about the openbmc mailing list