[PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: deprecate aspeed,sirq-polarity-sense

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:55:29PM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:25:09PM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:56:04AM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:18:31AM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:27:21PM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
> > > > > This property ties SIRQ polarity to SCU register bits that don't
> > > > > necessarily have any direct relationship to it; the only use of it
> > > > > was removed in commit c82bf6e133d30e0f9172a20807814fa28aef0f67.
> > > >
> > > > Please write that as:
> > > > 	c82bf6e133d3 ("ARM: aspeed: g5: Do not set sirq polarity")
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Ack, will do.
> > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev at bewilderbeest.net>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml | 1 +
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > What changed from previous versions?  That always goes below the ---
> > > > line.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > I included an overview of that in the cover letter (https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/20210402182724.20848-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net/);
> > > is it desirable to also have that duplicated in the individual patches in
> > > the series?
> > 
> > Any reason why you didn't include all of the relevant people and mailing
> > lists in that cover letter?  I've never seen it before :)
> > 
> 
> Ah -- is there a good rule of thumb (or git send-email trick) for that?
> Set-union of get_maintainer.pl over all the patches in the series?

There might be a git send-email trick, but I don't know it :(