Enable UBI support for a platform
Jiandi An
jan at nvidia.com
Wed Sep 9 10:45:30 AEST 2020
> On 08/09/20 12:39 am, Kun Zhao wrote:
> >
> > On 9/5/20 5:49 AM, Deepak Kodihalli wrote:
> >> Hi Kun,
> >>
> >> On 05/09/20 5:32 am, Kun Zhao wrote:
> >>> Hi Team,
> >>>
> >>> My platform is based on ast2500, and I’ve already been able to built
> >>> out the ubi image. But when I tried to test it with qemu, it just
> >>> stopped at u-boot because ‘can’t get kernel image,
> >>>
> >>> qemu-system-arm: Aspeed iBT has no chardev backend
> >>>
> >>> U-Boot 2016.07 (Sep 04 2020 - 19:47:48 +0000)
> >>>
> >>> Watchdog enabled
> >>>
> >>> DRAM: 496 MiB
> >>>
> >>> Flash: 32 MiB
> >>>
> >>> *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
> >>>
> >>> In: serial
> >>>
> >>> Out: serial
> >>>
> >>> Err: serial
> >>>
> >>> Net: MAC0 : RGMII
> >>>
> >>> MAC1 : RGMII
> >>>
> >>> FTGMAC100#0
> >>>
> >>> Error: FTGMAC100#0 address not set.
> >>>
> >>> , FTGMAC100#1
> >>>
> >>> Error: FTGMAC100#1 address not set.
> >>>
> >>> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
> >>>
> >>> Wrong Image Format for bootm command
> >>>
> >>> ERROR: can't get kernel image!
> >>>
> >>> ast#
> >>>
> >>> And I found the bootargs is not right,
> >>>
> >>> ast# print
> >>>
> >>> baudrate=115200
> >>>
> >>> bootargs=console=ttyS4,115200n8 root=/dev/ram rw
> >>>
> >>> bootcmd=bootm 20080000
> >>>
> >>> bootdelay=2
> >>>
> >>> Checked in the build folder for
> >>> tmp/work/myplatform-openbmc-linux-gnueabi/u-boot-aspeed/1_v2016.07+g
> >>> itAUTOINC+1ded9fa3a2-r0/ and found the none of the following patches
> >>> are there,
> >>>
> >>> 0002-config-ast-common-hack-bootopts.patch
> >>>
> >>> 0003-config-ast-common-Add-bootopts-to-support-ubi-and-mt.patch
> >>>
> >>> 0004-config-ast-common-Add-conditional-factory-reset-comm.patch
> >>>
> >>> 0005-config-ast-common-Fall-back-to-secondary-flash-on-fa.patch
> >>>
> >>> I think that’s why the bootargs is not correct.
> >>>
> >>> This is the details of how I enabled the ubi support in my platform
> >>> recipes,
> >>>
> >>> 1. In meta-myplatform/conf/distro/openbmc-myplatform.conf, I added,
> >>>
> >>> require conf/distro/include/phosphor-base.inc
> >>>
> >>> require conf/distro/include/phosphor-ubi.inc
> >>
> >> You should just need the one line above, plus a device tree change for your
> system. The default openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi doesn't make a ubifs partition.
> You can for eg look at witherspoon's dts, which uses ubifs.
> > Hi Deepak, thank you for reply. I've tried to use the witherspoon's flash layout
> per your tips here. But it still stops at u-boot with "can't get kernel image!" error.
> Do I need to enable any kernel config options?
>
>
> Hi Kun, I don't think you need additional kernel config updates. I suspect
> something wrong with the way the image is built. Are you able to see expected
> values for the u-boot environment variables and MTD partitions? For eg:
>
> ast# mtdparts
> device nor0 <bmc>, # parts = 3
> #: name size offset mask_flags
> 0: u-boot 0x00060000 0x00000000 0
> 1: u-boot-env 0x00020000 0x00060000 0
> 2: obmc-ubi 0x01f80000 0x00080000 0
> active partition: nor0,0 - (u-boot) 0x00060000 @ 0x00000000
>
Hi Deepak,
One thing is no mtdparts command from u-boot. Do we need to add CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS?
Here the comment says adding CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS won't work.
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-December/142837.html
Actually using witherspoon's flash layout
https://github.com/ibm-openbmc/openbmc/blob/OP940/meta-ibm/meta-witherspoon/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-aspeed/0001-ARM-dts-Aspeed-Witherspoon-128-Update-BMC-partitioni.patch
So the one we have in the device tree is as follows..
&fmc {
status = "okay";
flash at 0 {
status = "okay";
m25p,fast-read;
label = "bmc";
//#include "openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi"
partitions {
#address-cells = < 1 >;
#size-cells = < 1 >;
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
u-boot at 0 {
reg = < 0 0x60000 >;
label = "u-boot";
};
u-boot-env at 60000 {
reg = < 0x60000 0x20000 >;
label = "u-boot-env";
};
obmc-ubi at 80000 {
reg = <0x80000 0x7F80000>;
label = "obmc-ubi";
};
};
};
};
>
> >> Does anyone know why the default is static partitions, and not ubifs?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Deepak
> >>
> >>> 2. In meta-myplatform/conf/machine/myplatform.conf, I added,
> >>>
> >>> IMAGE_FSTYPES += " mtd-ubi mtd-ubi-tar"
> >>>
> >>> OBMC_MACHINE_FEATURES += " obmc-ubi-fs"
> >>>
> >>> Do I miss anything?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Kun Zhao
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>>
> >>> zkxz at hotmail.com <mailto:zkxz at hotmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> */
> >>>
> >>
> > Kun
> >
More information about the openbmc
mailing list