[External] Re: IPMI SEL Event ID

[Bills, Jason M]

On 10/15/2019 3:11 AM, Ivan Li11 wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> New SEL ID is still not from base number(1) after "sel clear" command with the fix you provided.
> Is there any setting I need to notice that?
> Please help to advise it.

Do you use rsyslog files or DBus entries for the SEL log?  The fix I 
made works only for rsyslog files by checking if the files have been 
deleted (after a SEL Clear) and resets to 1 if they have.

If you are using DBus for SEL log entries, then the logic to initialize 
and increment the SEL Record ID will need to be updated to also check DBus.

Thanks,
-Jason
> 
> Thanks,
> Ivan
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: openbmc <openbmc-bounces+rli11=lenovo.com at lists.ozlabs.org> On
>> Behalf Of Bills, Jason M
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 1:36 AM
>> To: openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org
>> Subject: [External] Re: IPMI SEL Event ID
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/22/2019 5:19 AM, Yonghui YH21 Liu wrote:
>>> HI All,
>>>
>>>            I find the new SEL event ID is not from base number(1) after
>>> I run "ipmitool sel clear" command.
>>>
>>>            Is it the OpenBMC default design rule ? If not, any plan to
>>> fix the issue?
>>
>> If you are using phosphor-sel-logger, it is a bug.  The fix for it is up for review
>> here:
>> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-sel-logger/+/24843
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Jason
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>