Add build date to image
www
ouyangxuan10 at 163.com
Fri Nov 22 20:17:33 AEDT 2019
hi ,
thank you for your help. I didn't test this, but I want ask a question, if this package hasn't been updated, the time will be updated automatically or not?
Thanks,
Byron
At 2019-11-22 17:06:04, "rgrs" <rgrs at protonmail.com> wrote:
Hi Byron,
We had a similiar need, and we use IPMI aux version for this purpose.
To get the behavior you describe, you can change your platform's phosphor-ipmi-config.bbappend
Witherspoon for example, calculates Aux rev info from VERSION_ID (git tag, I guess).
In our platforms, we instead write DDMMYYYY into IPMI Get Dev ID's aux rev info (4bytes, BCD)
"ipmitool mc info" would looks something like below:
Aux Firmware Rev Info :
0x22
0x11
0x19
0x20
Thanks,
Raj
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 6:32 AM, www <ouyangxuan10 at 163.com> wrote:
Dear Joseph & Vijay Khemka,
No matter what your version is, build date only represents the time when the image was created.
thanks,
Byron
At 2019-11-21 02:08:40, "Vijay Khemka" <vijaykhemka at fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 11/20/19, 8:40 AM, "openbmc on behalf of Joseph Reynolds" <openbmc-bounces+vijaykhemka=fb.com at lists.ozlabs.org on behalf of jrey at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/19 7:23 PM, www wrote:
> > Dear Joseph,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your help. I just want to show the compile
> > time of firmware to the user. If only show the version, it can't
> > correspond to the time. When both are displayed at the same time, the
> > information will be clearer. thanks again.
> >
>
> Byron, thanks for that. I think I understand your use case. However,
> does this practice assume the build date is close to the date when the
> software version was created?
> - For example, I assume you'll merge a git commit to create a new
> software version, and then build an image based on that commit. In this
> way, the build date correlates closely with the version.
> - However, if you build an image from an older commit, or wait a long
> time before building an image, the build date will not correlate closely
> with the version. This can be misleading and lead to errors in handling
> images.
>
>I guess build date should be the date version was released or created.
>
> Is that a concern for you?
>
> - Joseph
>
> > thanks,
> > Byron
> >
> ...snip...
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20191122/55da4faa/attachment.htm>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list