[External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to be incorrect

Patrick Venture venture at google.com
Tue Jul 23 00:33:33 AEST 2019


On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:44 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com> wrote:

>
>
> *发件人:* Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> *发送时间:* 2019年7月20日 1:06
> *收件人:* Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> *抄送:* openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Duke KH Du <dukh at lenovo.com>; Yonghui
> YH21 Liu <liuyh21 at lenovo.com>
> *主题:* Re: [External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to
> be incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:46 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> *发送时间:* 2019年7月20日 0:08
> *收件人:* Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> *抄送:* openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Duke KH Du <dukh at lenovo.com>; Yonghui
> YH21 Liu <liuyh21 at lenovo.com>
> *主题:* Re: [External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to
> be incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:58 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:37 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 4:50 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
>
>
> Please see my below comments.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> *发送时间:* 2019年7月19日 0:52
> *收件人:* Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> *抄送:* openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Duke KH Du <dukh at lenovo.com>; Yonghui
> YH21 Liu <liuyh21 at lenovo.com>
> *主题:* Re: [External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to
> be incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:27 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
>
>
> Could you give me a hand on below problems? Thanks.
>
> 1.      I compiled the latest version of phosphor-ipmi-flash with OpenBMC
> SDK environment to build host tool, but encounter configuration error
> message as below, could you help to take a look at it?
>
> ./configure --enable-oe-sdk --host "$(uname -m)"
> --disable-build-bmc-blob-handler  AR=x86_64-openbmc-linux-gcc-ar
> RANLIB=x86_64-openbmc-linux-gcc-ranlib
>
> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -lgmock... yes
> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -pthread... (cached) yes
> checking for main in -lgmock... yes
> checking for valgrind... no
> checking whether to build with code coverage support... no
> configure: Enabling OE-SDK at
> /home/pengms1/SDK/openbmc-sdk/2.8.0/sysroots/core2-64-openbmc-linux
> configure: error: conditional "HAVE_SYSTEMD" was never defined.
> Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally.
>
>
>
>
>
> Have systemd is only important for the BMC code, so it's unimportant in
> this case.
>
> It block Makefile generation, how can I do to avoid this error to generate
> Makefile?
>
>
>
> I'll see if I need to always define it -- not sure why you're hitting this
> and I wasn't, but I'll take a look.
>
>
>
> Verified I can reproduce:
>
> checking that generated files are newer than configure... done
> configure: error: conditional "HAVE_SYSTEMD" was never defined.
> Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally.
> root at 3b8289721be4:/phosphor-ipmi-flash#
>
>
>
> The issue is that although it doesn't use the bmc/Makefile in the
> configuration, it still needs the variable defined.  I moved the systemd
> search into only the bmc case because the host tool doesn't use systemd.
>
>
>
> Follow-on, I'm submitting a patch to fix that momentarily.
>
>
>
> To address the other issue, it may behoove us to add some always-on debug
> logging, so we can see a few things.  One approach however, would be to try
> sending down a 64 byte file instead of the 32MB -- just to make the testing
> slightly faster.
>
>
>
> The other thing is the kernel you're using, I don't use the same one --
> perhaps there are differences from openbmc/linux.
>
>
>
> We are using the openbmc/kernel. In development phase, we use our DT file
> from our lenovo meta-layer since it is easy to develop and test. We have
> been done upstream DT file to mainline kernel and openbmc kernel as below
> link.
>
>
> https://github.com/openbmc/linux/blob/dev-5.2/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-lenovo-hr630.dts
>
>
>
> Can you remove the flash property from the lpc_ctrl node and try again?  I
> don't think it's an issue, but it's something different.
>
>
>
> l  DTS modification is below.   (Remove memory-region and flash, transfer
> data failed )
>
>
>
>  @@ -40,11 +40,6 @@
>
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
>
>                 ranges;
>
>
>
> -               flash_memory: region at 98000000 {
>
> -                       no-map;
>
> -                       reg = <0x98000000 0x00100000>; /* 1M */
>
> -               };
>
> -
>
>                 gfx_memory: framebuffer {
>
>                         size = <0x01000000>;
>
>                         alignment = <0x01000000>;
>
> @@ -88,8 +83,6 @@
>
>
>
>     &lpc_ctrl {
>
>         status = "okay";
>
> -       memory-region = <&flash_memory>;
>
> -       flash = <&spi1>;
>
>            };
>
>
>
>       ###  journalctl log message:
>
> Jul 19 01:50:27 hr630 ipmid[360]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>
> Jul 19 01:50:27 hr630 ipmid[360]: Failed to ioctl Aspeed LPC map with
> error No such device or address
>
> Jul 19 01:50:27 hr630 ipmid[360]: mappingResult.response 22
>
> Jul 19 01:50:27 hr630 ipmid[360]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>
> Jul 19 01:50:27 hr630 ipmid[360]: Failed to ioctl Aspeed LPC map with
> error No such device or address
>
> Jul 19 01:50:27 hr630 ipmid[360]: mappingResult.response 22
>

I would not expect it to work without the memory-region.


>
>
> l  DTS modification is below.  DTS modification is below.   (Remove flash,
> transfer data successful but the data was incorrect)
>
>
>
> @@ -89,7 +89,11 @@
>
> &lpc_ctrl {
>
>        status = "okay";
>
>         memory-region = <&flash_memory>;
>
> -       flash = <&spi1>;
>
>
>
>              ###  journalctl log message:
>
>                 Jul 17 09:45:27 hr630 systemd[1]: Reached target
> Phosphor-ipmi-flash Prepare BMC to receive update.
>
>                  Jul 17 09:45:27 hr630 ipmid[289]: requesting Aspeed LPC
> window at 0x40000000 of size 65536
>

Ok, so that's interesting.

Did you try only sending a tiny data piece, such as a 64 bytes of random
data from the host, and then seeing if that arrives safely.  I don't
imagine it does, but I wanted to simplify what you're testing.


>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.      According to your suggestion, our BIOS engineer help to reserve
> host memory addr 0x40000000 with size 256KB and initiate this region with
> value 0xaa. I can see the value Oxaaaaaaaa from memory addr 0x40000000 via
> devmem2 tool. The memory region was overwritten during executable
> burn_my_bmc running, I compared the content between BMC and host image but
> it was Inconsistent. Could you give me some advice to solve it?
>
>
> BMC configuration setting:
> EXTRA_OECONF += " --enable-reboot-update  --enable-static-layout
> --enable-aspeed-lpc MAPPED_ADDRESS=0x40000000 --enable-reboot-update"
>
> Host tool setting:
> ./burn_my_bmc --command update --interface ipmilpc --image ./630.mtd --sig
> ./sig.txt --type static --address 0x40000000 --length 65536
>
>
>
> Interesting, so you're seeing the memory getting changed, but the bmc
> image doesn't match.
>
> Can you point me to your device tree? (for sanity checking)
> DT file is below:
>
> https://github.com/LenovoHS/openbmc/blob/master/meta-lenovo/meta-hr630/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-aspeed/aspeed-bmc-lenovo-hr630.dts
>
>
>
> What's the SHA for your linux tree (I want to make sure it has the
> optional feature for aspeed-lpc-ctrl)
>
>     I don’t know where can obtain the SHA value of linux tree, could you
> give me clues or guidance?
>
>
>
> You're pointing to a different linux tree for your device-tree, presumably
> you're not using openbmc/linux?
>
>
>
>
>
> Do you see any output from journalctl?  I asked last time, but this if
> leads with ipmid can hold some details.
>
> l  *Only host reserve memory addr 0x40000000 with 256KB, transfer data
> failed.*
>
> ## DTS setting:
>
>         &lpc_ctrl {
>
>             status = "okay";
>
>         };
>
>
>
>     ## journalctl log message:
>
>         Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: Failed to ioctl Aspeed LPC map
> with error No such device or address
>
>         Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: mappingResult.response 22
>
>         Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>
>         Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: Failed to ioctl Aspeed LPC map
> with error No such device or address
>
>         Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: mappingResult.response 22
>
>
>
>      ## BMC Registers (It is the same as default value):
>
>         (HICR7) devmem 0x1E789088
>
>          0x3000FFF8
>
>         (HICR8) devmem 0x1E78908c
>
>          0xFFF8F007
>
>         (HICR5) devmem 0x1E789080
>
>         0x00000403
>
>
>
> l  *BMC reserve memory addr 0x98000000 with 1MB and host reserve memory
> addr 0x40000000 with 256KB, transfer data successful but the data was
> incorrect.*
>
> ## DTS setting:
>
>         flash_memory: region at 98000000 {
>
>                 no-map;
>
>                 reg = <0x98000000 0x00100000>; /* 1M */
>
>             };
>
>
>
>         &lpc_ctrl {
>
>             status = "okay";
>
>             memory-region = <&flash_memory>;
>
>             flash = <&spi1>;
>
>         };
>
>
>
>     ## journalctl log message:
>
>         Jul 19 02:05:26 hr630 systemd[1]: Reached target
> Phosphor-ipmi-flash Prepare BMC to receive update.
>
>         Jul 19 02:05:26 hr630 ipmid[339]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>
>         Jul 19 02:05:52 hr630 ipmid[339]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>
>         Jul 19 02:05:52 hr630 systemd[1]: Reached target
> Phosphor-ipmi-flash verify the image contents.
>
>
>
> Good that you're no longer seeing a problem with this.  I wonder if
> there's something different with the lpc_ctrl in this case since you're
> specifying the flash node (a version of the driver+config i haven't tested).
>
>
>
>
>
>     ## BMC Registers:
>
>         (HICR7) devmem 0x1E789088
>
>         0x98004000
>
>         (HICR8) devmem 0x1E78908c
>
>         0xFFFF0000
>
>         (HICR5) devmem 0x1E789080
>
>         0x00000503
>
>
>
>
>
> I tested this with a 4K region on aspeed-lpc with the ast2500 and it
> worked fine, so I do expect it to work... but you may have found some edge
> case -- you're saying the length for the region should be 64KB, and that
> should be fine...
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
> *发送时间:* 2019年7月16日 23:38
> *收件人:* Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> *抄送:* openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Duke KH Du <dukh at lenovo.com>
> *主题:* [External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to be
> incorrect
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:31 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> 1.      I downloaded the latest version of phosphor-ipmi-flash to build
> host tool with the SDK environment you provide, but encounter configure
> error as below, could you help to take a look at it?
>
> *Source code hash id*
>
> *Compile Status*
>
> *Error message*
>
> b90cacdd0c1ab8ea7576d4ca9f20aa5828a84e42
>
> configure successful
>
> fd182168d9d1c852b1047b9eccea56812b614586
> 1999eef0e6ad3ab4ad6fcf58cce47f352ca5e137
> fa06a5f0056e91bfada390c4007fbd3472d75a56
> 7c2a00e02f1f0169b3e80ef1715002cefc6fa0d0
> c9792e75361c86da7f674976eacd03c761021d2f
>
> configure failed
>
> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -lgtest... yes
> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -pthread... (cached) yes
> checking for main in -lgtest... yes
> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -lgmock... yes
> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -pthread... (cached) yes
> checking for main in -lgmock... yes
> checking for valgrind... no
> checking whether to build with code coverage support... no
> configure: Enabling OE-SDK at
> /home/pengms1/SDK/openbmc-sdk/2.8.0/sysroots/core2-64-openbmc-linux
> configure: error: conditional "HAVE_SYSTEMD" was never defined.
> Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally.
>
> 2.      The host tool compiled with phosphor-ipmi-flash hash id
> b90cacdd0c1ab8ea7576d4ca9f20aa5828a84e42 and BMC flash library compiled
> with phosphor-ipmi-flash hash id c9792e75361c86da7f674976eacd03c761021d2f,
> the BMC image can transfer from host side to BMC side via LPC bridge. The
> image size is correct, but the image content seems to be incorrect as
> below, could you give us some clues to solve it if this is an issue?
>
> Image of host side
>
> Image of BMC side
>
> pengms1 at hsbmc:/flash_tool$ hexdump -n 64 ./630.mtd
>
> 0000000 00be ea00 f014 e59f f014 e59f f014 e59f
>
> 0000010 f014 e59f f014 e59f f014 e59f f014 e59f
>
> 0000020 0060 0000 00c0 0000 0120 0000 0180 0000
>
> 0000030 01e0 0000 0240 0000 02a0 0000 beef dead
>
> root at hr630:~# hexdump -n 64 /run/initramfs/bmc-image
>
> 0000000 abc4 ef4e 11f2 b128 2538 fd9c 9f7a 2e00
>
> 0000010 78c4 af6e 01f2 a92a 7438 759c 8e76 2e00
>
> 0000020 f397 05f0 84e4 6546 0ac6 b6d0 ef19 cb80
>
> 0000030 e9d7 82f0 c4e4 75dc 1bc6 a295 7319 49c4
>
> DTS setting:
>              flash_memory: region at 98000000 {
>                     no-map;
>                     reg = <0x98000000 0x00100000>; /* 1M */
>              };
>
> BMC configuration setting:
> EXTRA_OECONF += " --enable-reboot-update  --enable-static-layout
> --enable-aspeed-lpc MAPPED_ADDRESS=0x98000000 --enable-reboot-update"
>
> Host tool setting:
> ./burn_my_bmc --command update --interface ipmilpc --image ./630.mtd --sig
> ./sig.txt --type static --address 2550136832 --length 65536
>
>
>
> The address provided for the host:
>
> >>> '0x%x' % 2550136832
>
> '0x98000000'
>
>
>
> Is a region of memory on the host that's set aside for this purpose and is
> mapped via /dev/mem.  It's not the address the BMC Is using.  You'll need
> to use a region reserved for this purpose in the host kernel or bios.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20190722/f0557a6e/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the openbmc mailing list