[External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to be incorrect
Patrick Venture
venture at google.com
Sat Jul 20 01:58:49 AEST 2019
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:37 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 4:50 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please see my below comments.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> *发件人:* Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
>> *发送时间:* 2019年7月19日 0:52
>> *收件人:* Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
>> *抄送:* openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Duke KH Du <dukh at lenovo.com>; Yonghui
>> YH21 Liu <liuyh21 at lenovo.com>
>> *主题:* Re: [External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to
>> be incorrect
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:27 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you give me a hand on below problems? Thanks.
>>
>> 1. I compiled the latest version of phosphor-ipmi-flash with
>> OpenBMC SDK environment to build host tool, but encounter configuration
>> error message as below, could you help to take a look at it?
>>
>> ./configure --enable-oe-sdk --host "$(uname -m)"
>> --disable-build-bmc-blob-handler AR=x86_64-openbmc-linux-gcc-ar
>> RANLIB=x86_64-openbmc-linux-gcc-ranlib
>>
>> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -lgmock... yes
>> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -pthread... (cached) yes
>> checking for main in -lgmock... yes
>> checking for valgrind... no
>> checking whether to build with code coverage support... no
>> configure: Enabling OE-SDK at
>> /home/pengms1/SDK/openbmc-sdk/2.8.0/sysroots/core2-64-openbmc-linux
>> configure: error: conditional "HAVE_SYSTEMD" was never defined.
>> Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Have systemd is only important for the BMC code, so it's unimportant in
>> this case.
>>
>> It block Makefile generation, how can I do to avoid this error to
>> generate Makefile?
>>
>
> I'll see if I need to always define it -- not sure why you're hitting this
> and I wasn't, but I'll take a look.
>
Verified I can reproduce:
checking that generated files are newer than configure... done
configure: error: conditional "HAVE_SYSTEMD" was never defined.
Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally.
root at 3b8289721be4:/phosphor-ipmi-flash#
The issue is that although it doesn't use the bmc/Makefile in the
configuration, it still needs the variable defined. I moved the systemd
search into only the bmc case because the host tool doesn't use systemd.
>
>>
>> 2. According to your suggestion, our BIOS engineer help to reserve
>> host memory addr 0x40000000 with size 256KB and initiate this region with
>> value 0xaa. I can see the value Oxaaaaaaaa from memory addr 0x40000000 via
>> devmem2 tool. The memory region was overwritten during executable
>> burn_my_bmc running, I compared the content between BMC and host image but
>> it was Inconsistent. Could you give me some advice to solve it?
>>
>>
>> BMC configuration setting:
>> EXTRA_OECONF += " --enable-reboot-update --enable-static-layout
>> --enable-aspeed-lpc MAPPED_ADDRESS=0x40000000 --enable-reboot-update"
>>
>> Host tool setting:
>> ./burn_my_bmc --command update --interface ipmilpc --image ./630.mtd
>> --sig ./sig.txt --type static --address 0x40000000 --length 65536
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting, so you're seeing the memory getting changed, but the bmc
>> image doesn't match.
>>
>> Can you point me to your device tree? (for sanity checking)
>> DT file is below:
>>
>> https://github.com/LenovoHS/openbmc/blob/master/meta-lenovo/meta-hr630/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-aspeed/aspeed-bmc-lenovo-hr630.dts
>>
>>
>>
>> What's the SHA for your linux tree (I want to make sure it has the
>> optional feature for aspeed-lpc-ctrl)
>>
>> I don’t know where can obtain the SHA value of linux tree, could you
>> give me clues or guidance?
>>
>
> You're pointing to a different linux tree for your device-tree, presumably
> you're not using openbmc/linux?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Do you see any output from journalctl? I asked last time, but this if
>> leads with ipmid can hold some details.
>>
>> l *Only host **reserve memory addr 0x**40000000 with 256KB, transfer
>> data failed.*
>>
>> ## DTS setting:
>>
>> &lpc_ctrl {
>>
>> status = "okay";
>>
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>> ## journalctl log message:
>>
>> Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: Failed to ioctl Aspeed LPC map
>> with error No such device or address
>>
>> Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: mappingResult.response 22
>>
>> Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
>> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>>
>> Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: Failed to ioctl Aspeed LPC map
>> with error No such device or address
>>
>> Jul 19 02:06:02 hr630 ipmid[347]: mappingResult.response 22
>>
>>
>>
>> ## BMC Registers (It is the same as default value):
>>
>> (HICR7) devmem 0x1E789088
>>
>> 0x3000FFF8
>>
>> (HICR8) devmem 0x1E78908c
>>
>> 0xFFF8F007
>>
>> (HICR5) devmem 0x1E789080
>>
>> 0x00000403
>>
>>
>>
>> l *BMC reserve memory addr 0x**98000000 with 1MB and host **reserve
>> memory addr 0x**40000000 with 256KB, transfer data successful but the
>> data was incorrect.*
>>
>> ## DTS setting:
>>
>> flash_memory: region at 98000000 {
>>
>> no-map;
>>
>> reg = <0x98000000 0x00100000>; /* 1M */
>>
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>> &lpc_ctrl {
>>
>> status = "okay";
>>
>> memory-region = <&flash_memory>;
>>
>> flash = <&spi1>;
>>
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>> ## journalctl log message:
>>
>> Jul 19 02:05:26 hr630 systemd[1]: Reached target
>> Phosphor-ipmi-flash Prepare BMC to receive update.
>>
>> Jul 19 02:05:26 hr630 ipmid[339]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
>> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>>
>> Jul 19 02:05:52 hr630 ipmid[339]: requesting Aspeed LPC window at
>> 0x40000000 of size 65536
>>
> Jul 19 02:05:52 hr630 systemd[1]: Reached target
>> Phosphor-ipmi-flash verify the image contents.
>>
>
> Good that you're no longer seeing a problem with this. I wonder if
> there's something different with the lpc_ctrl in this case since you're
> specifying the flash node (a version of the driver+config i haven't tested).
>
>
>>
>>
>> ## BMC Registers:
>>
>> (HICR7) devmem 0x1E789088
>>
>> 0x98004000
>>
>> (HICR8) devmem 0x1E78908c
>>
>> 0xFFFF0000
>>
>> (HICR5) devmem 0x1E789080
>>
>> 0x00000503
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I tested this with a 4K region on aspeed-lpc with the ast2500 and it
>> worked fine, so I do expect it to work... but you may have found some edge
>> case -- you're saying the length for the region should be 64KB, and that
>> should be fine...
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> *发件人:* Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
>> *发送时间:* 2019年7月16日 23:38
>> *收件人:* Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
>> *抄送:* openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Duke KH Du <dukh at lenovo.com>
>> *主题:* [External] Re: configure error and the image content seems to be
>> incorrect
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:31 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> 1. I downloaded the latest version of phosphor-ipmi-flash to build
>> host tool with the SDK environment you provide, but encounter configure
>> error as below, could you help to take a look at it?
>>
>> *Source code hash id*
>>
>> *Compile Status*
>>
>> *Error message*
>>
>> b90cacdd0c1ab8ea7576d4ca9f20aa5828a84e42
>>
>> configure successful
>>
>> fd182168d9d1c852b1047b9eccea56812b614586
>> 1999eef0e6ad3ab4ad6fcf58cce47f352ca5e137
>> fa06a5f0056e91bfada390c4007fbd3472d75a56
>> 7c2a00e02f1f0169b3e80ef1715002cefc6fa0d0
>> c9792e75361c86da7f674976eacd03c761021d2f
>>
>> configure failed
>>
>> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -lgtest... yes
>> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -pthread... (cached) yes
>> checking for main in -lgtest... yes
>> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -lgmock... yes
>> checking whether C++ compiler accepts -pthread... (cached) yes
>> checking for main in -lgmock... yes
>> checking for valgrind... no
>> checking whether to build with code coverage support... no
>> configure: Enabling OE-SDK at
>> /home/pengms1/SDK/openbmc-sdk/2.8.0/sysroots/core2-64-openbmc-linux
>> configure: error: conditional "HAVE_SYSTEMD" was never defined.
>> Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally.
>>
>> 2. The host tool compiled with phosphor-ipmi-flash hash id
>> b90cacdd0c1ab8ea7576d4ca9f20aa5828a84e42 and BMC flash library compiled
>> with phosphor-ipmi-flash hash id c9792e75361c86da7f674976eacd03c761021d2f,
>> the BMC image can transfer from host side to BMC side via LPC bridge. The
>> image size is correct, but the image content seems to be incorrect as
>> below, could you give us some clues to solve it if this is an issue?
>>
>> Image of host side
>>
>> Image of BMC side
>>
>> pengms1 at hsbmc:/flash_tool$ hexdump -n 64 ./630.mtd
>>
>> 0000000 00be ea00 f014 e59f f014 e59f f014 e59f
>>
>> 0000010 f014 e59f f014 e59f f014 e59f f014 e59f
>>
>> 0000020 0060 0000 00c0 0000 0120 0000 0180 0000
>>
>> 0000030 01e0 0000 0240 0000 02a0 0000 beef dead
>>
>> root at hr630:~# hexdump -n 64 /run/initramfs/bmc-image
>>
>> 0000000 abc4 ef4e 11f2 b128 2538 fd9c 9f7a 2e00
>>
>> 0000010 78c4 af6e 01f2 a92a 7438 759c 8e76 2e00
>>
>> 0000020 f397 05f0 84e4 6546 0ac6 b6d0 ef19 cb80
>>
>> 0000030 e9d7 82f0 c4e4 75dc 1bc6 a295 7319 49c4
>>
>> DTS setting:
>> flash_memory: region at 98000000 {
>> no-map;
>> reg = <0x98000000 0x00100000>; /* 1M */
>> };
>>
>> BMC configuration setting:
>> EXTRA_OECONF += " --enable-reboot-update --enable-static-layout
>> --enable-aspeed-lpc MAPPED_ADDRESS=0x98000000 --enable-reboot-update"
>>
>> Host tool setting:
>> ./burn_my_bmc --command update --interface ipmilpc --image ./630.mtd
>> --sig ./sig.txt --type static --address 2550136832 --length 65536
>>
>>
>>
>> The address provided for the host:
>>
>> >>> '0x%x' % 2550136832
>>
>> '0x98000000'
>>
>>
>>
>> Is a region of memory on the host that's set aside for this purpose and
>> is mapped via /dev/mem. It's not the address the BMC Is using. You'll
>> need to use a region reserved for this purpose in the host kernel or bios.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20190719/4f4724eb/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list