[PATCH v11 14/14] hwmon: Add PECI dimmtemp driver
Guenter Roeck
linux at roeck-us.net
Tue Dec 17 08:21:20 AEDT 2019
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:04:31PM -0800, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On 12/12/2019 10:32 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 12/11/19 11:46 AM, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
> > > This commit adds PECI dimmtemp hwmon driver.
> > >
> > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare at suse.com>
> > > Cc: Alan Cox <alan at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au>
> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> > > Cc: Jason M Biils <jason.m.bills at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>
> > > Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> > > Cc: Stef van Os <stef.van.os at prodrive-technologies.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang at linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: James Feist <james.feist at linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery at linux.intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v10:
> > > - Added Skylake Xeon D support.
> > > - Added max and crit properties for temperature threshold checking.
> > > - Fixed minor bugs and style issues.
> > >
> > > drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 14 ++
> > > drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/hwmon/peci-dimmtemp.c | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 408 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/peci-dimmtemp.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > > index b6604759579c..d3370fbab40c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1363,6 +1363,20 @@ config SENSORS_PECI_CPUTEMP
> > > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> > > will be called peci-cputemp.
> > > +config SENSORS_PECI_DIMMTEMP
> > > + tristate "PECI DIMM temperature monitoring client"
> > > + depends on PECI
> > > + select MFD_INTEL_PECI_CLIENT
> > > + help
> > > + If you say yes here you get support for the generic Intel
> > > PECI hwmon
> > > + driver which provides Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) thermal
> > > readings of
> > > + DIMM components that are accessible using the PECI Client Command
> > > + Suite via the processor PECI client.
> > > + Check <file:Documentation/hwmon/peci-dimmtemp.rst> for details.
> > > +
> > > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> > > + will be called peci-dimmtemp.
> > > +
> > > source "drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig"
> > > config SENSORS_PWM_FAN
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > > index d6fea48697af..4015c4b60bf4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87360) += pc87360.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PC87427) += pc87427.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PCF8591) += pcf8591.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PECI_CPUTEMP) += peci-cputemp.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PECI_DIMMTEMP) += peci-dimmtemp.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_POWR1220) += powr1220.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN) += pwm-fan.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON) += raspberrypi-hwmon.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci-dimmtemp.c
> > > b/drivers/hwmon/peci-dimmtemp.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..974f453f9366
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci-dimmtemp.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +// Copyright (c) 2018-2019 Intel Corporation
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > > +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mfd/intel-peci-client.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > > +#include "peci-hwmon.h"
> > > +
> > > +#define DIMM_MASK_CHECK_DELAY_JIFFIES msecs_to_jiffies(5000)
> > > +#define DIMM_MASK_CHECK_RETRY_MAX 60 /* 60 x 5 secs = 5 minutes */
> > > +
> > > +struct peci_dimmtemp {
> > > + struct peci_client_manager *mgr;
> > > + struct device *dev;
> > > + char name[PECI_NAME_SIZE];
> > > + const struct cpu_gen_info *gen_info;
> > > + struct workqueue_struct *work_queue;
> > > + struct delayed_work work_handler;
> > > + struct peci_sensor_data temp[DIMM_NUMS_MAX];
> > > + long temp_max[DIMM_NUMS_MAX];
> > > + long temp_crit[DIMM_NUMS_MAX];
> > > + u32 dimm_mask;
> > > + int retry_count;
> > > + u32 temp_config[DIMM_NUMS_MAX + 1];
> > > + struct hwmon_channel_info temp_info;
> > > + const struct hwmon_channel_info *info[2];
> > > + struct hwmon_chip_info chip;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const char *dimmtemp_label[CHAN_RANK_MAX][DIMM_IDX_MAX] = {
> > > + { "DIMM A1", "DIMM A2", "DIMM A3" },
> > > + { "DIMM B1", "DIMM B2", "DIMM B3" },
> > > + { "DIMM C1", "DIMM C2", "DIMM C3" },
> > > + { "DIMM D1", "DIMM D2", "DIMM D3" },
> > > + { "DIMM E1", "DIMM E2", "DIMM E3" },
> > > + { "DIMM F1", "DIMM F2", "DIMM F3" },
> > > + { "DIMM G1", "DIMM G2", "DIMM G3" },
> > > + { "DIMM H1", "DIMM H2", "DIMM H3" },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static inline int read_ddr_dimm_temp_config(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv,
> > > + int chan_rank,
> > > + u8 *cfg_data)
> > > +{
> > > + return peci_client_read_package_config(priv->mgr,
> > > + PECI_MBX_INDEX_DDR_DIMM_TEMP,
> > > + chan_rank, cfg_data);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int get_dimm_temp(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv, int dimm_no)
> > > +{
> > > + int dimm_order = dimm_no % priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
> > > + int chan_rank = dimm_no / priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
> > > + struct peci_rd_pci_cfg_local_msg rp_msg;
> > > + u8 cfg_data[4];
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (!peci_sensor_need_update(&priv->temp[dimm_no]))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + ret = read_ddr_dimm_temp_config(priv, chan_rank, cfg_data);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + priv->temp[dimm_no].value = cfg_data[dimm_order] * 1000;
> > > +
> > > + switch (priv->gen_info->model) {
> > > + case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X:
> > > + rp_msg.addr = priv->mgr->client->addr;
> > > + rp_msg.bus = 2;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Device 10, Function 2: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
> > > + * Device 10, Function 6: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
> > > + * Device 11, Function 2: IMC 0 channel 2 -> rank 2
> > > + * Device 12, Function 2: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 3
> > > + * Device 12, Function 6: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 4
> > > + * Device 13, Function 2: IMC 1 channel 2 -> rank 5
> > > + */
> > > + rp_msg.device = 10 + chan_rank / 3 * 2 +
> > > + (chan_rank % 3 == 2 ? 1 : 0);
> > > + rp_msg.function = chan_rank % 3 == 1 ? 6 : 2;
> > > + rp_msg.reg = 0x120 + dimm_order * 4;
> > > + rp_msg.rx_len = 4;
> > > +
> > > + ret = peci_command(priv->mgr->client->adapter,
> > > + PECI_CMD_RD_PCI_CFG_LOCAL, &rp_msg);
> > > + if (rp_msg.cc != PECI_DEV_CC_SUCCESS)
> > > + ret = -EAGAIN;
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = rp_msg.pci_config[1] * 1000;
> > > + priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = rp_msg.pci_config[2] * 1000;
> > > + break;
> > > + case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_XD:
> > > + rp_msg.addr = priv->mgr->client->addr;
> > > + rp_msg.bus = 2;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Device 10, Function 2: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
> > > + * Device 10, Function 6: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
> > > + * Device 12, Function 2: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 2
> > > + * Device 12, Function 6: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 3
> > > + */
> > > + rp_msg.device = 10 + chan_rank / 2 * 2;
> > > + rp_msg.function = (chan_rank % 2) ? 6 : 2;
> > > + rp_msg.reg = 0x120 + dimm_order * 4;
> > > + rp_msg.rx_len = 4;
> > > +
> > > + ret = peci_command(priv->mgr->client->adapter,
> > > + PECI_CMD_RD_PCI_CFG_LOCAL, &rp_msg);
> > > + if (rp_msg.cc != PECI_DEV_CC_SUCCESS)
> > > + ret = -EAGAIN;
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = rp_msg.pci_config[1] * 1000;
> > > + priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = rp_msg.pci_config[2] * 1000;
> > > + break;
> > > + case INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X:
> > > + case INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X:
> > > + rp_msg.addr = priv->mgr->client->addr;
> > > + rp_msg.bus = 1;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Device 20, Function 0: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
> > > + * Device 20, Function 1: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
> > > + * Device 21, Function 0: IMC 0 channel 2 -> rank 2
> > > + * Device 21, Function 1: IMC 0 channel 3 -> rank 3
> > > + * Device 23, Function 0: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 4
> > > + * Device 23, Function 1: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 5
> > > + * Device 24, Function 0: IMC 1 channel 2 -> rank 6
> > > + * Device 24, Function 1: IMC 1 channel 3 -> rank 7
> > > + */
> > > + rp_msg.device = 20 + chan_rank / 2 + chan_rank / 4;
> > > + rp_msg.function = chan_rank % 2;
> > > + rp_msg.reg = 0x120 + dimm_order * 4;
> > > + rp_msg.rx_len = 4;
> > > +
> > > + ret = peci_command(priv->mgr->client->adapter,
> > > + PECI_CMD_RD_PCI_CFG_LOCAL, &rp_msg);
> > > + if (rp_msg.cc != PECI_DEV_CC_SUCCESS)
> > > + ret = -EAGAIN;
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = rp_msg.pci_config[1] * 1000;
> > > + priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = rp_msg.pci_config[2] * 1000;
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > It looks like the sensors are created even on unsupported platforms,
> > which would generate error messages whenever someone tries to read
> > the attributes.
> >
> > There should be some code early on checking this, and the driver
> > should not even instantiate if the CPU model is not supported.
>
> Actually, this 'default' case will not be happened because this driver
> will be registered only when the CPU model is supported. The CPU model
> checking code is in 'intel-peci-client.c' which is [11/14] of this
> patch set.
>
That again assumes that both drivers will be modified in sync in the future.
We can not make that assumption.
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + peci_sensor_mark_updated(&priv->temp[dimm_no]);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int dimmtemp_read_string(struct device *dev,
> > > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel, const char **str)
> > > +{
> > > + struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + u32 dimm_idx_max = priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
> > > + int chan_rank, dimm_idx;
> > > +
> > > + if (attr != hwmon_temp_label)
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +
> > > + chan_rank = channel / dimm_idx_max;
> > > + dimm_idx = channel % dimm_idx_max;
> > > + *str = dimmtemp_label[chan_rank][dimm_idx];
> >
> > Similar to the other patch, I am concerned that this can end up setting
> > *str
> > to NULL at some point in the future.
>
> Okay. I'll make dynamic label string table generation code for it as
> well.
>
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int dimmtemp_read(struct device *dev, enum
> > > hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> > > +{
> > > + struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = get_dimm_temp(priv, channel);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + switch (attr) {
> > > + case hwmon_temp_input:
> > > + *val = priv->temp[channel].value;
> > > + break;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_max:
> > > + *val = priv->temp_max[channel];
> > > + break;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_crit:
> > > + *val = priv->temp_crit[channel];
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static umode_t dimmtemp_is_visible(const void *data,
> > > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel)
> > > +{
> > > + const struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = data;
> > > +
> > > + if (priv->temp_config[channel] & BIT(attr) &&
> > > + priv->dimm_mask & BIT(channel))
> > > + return 0444;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct hwmon_ops dimmtemp_ops = {
> > > + .is_visible = dimmtemp_is_visible,
> > > + .read_string = dimmtemp_read_string,
> > > + .read = dimmtemp_read,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
> > > +{
> > > + u32 chan_rank_max = priv->gen_info->chan_rank_max;
> > > + u32 dimm_idx_max = priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
> > > + int chan_rank, dimm_idx;
> > > + u8 cfg_data[4];
> > > +
> > > + for (chan_rank = 0; chan_rank < chan_rank_max; chan_rank++) {
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = read_ddr_dimm_temp_config(priv, chan_rank, cfg_data);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + priv->dimm_mask = 0;
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (dimm_idx = 0; dimm_idx < dimm_idx_max; dimm_idx++)
> > > + if (cfg_data[dimm_idx])
> > > + priv->dimm_mask |= BIT(chan_rank *
> > > + dimm_idx_max +
> > > + dimm_idx);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (!priv->dimm_mask)
> > > + return -EAGAIN;
> > > +
> > > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Scanned populated DIMMs: 0x%x\n",
> > > priv->dimm_mask);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int create_dimm_temp_info(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret, i, config_idx, channels;
> > > + struct device *hwmon_dev;
> > > +
> > > + ret = check_populated_dimms(priv);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> > > + if (priv->retry_count < DIMM_MASK_CHECK_RETRY_MAX) {
> > > + queue_delayed_work(priv->work_queue,
> > > + &priv->work_handler,
> > > + DIMM_MASK_CHECK_DELAY_JIFFIES);
> > > + priv->retry_count++;
> > > + dev_dbg(priv->dev,
> > > + "Deferred DIMM temp info creation\n");
> > > + } else {
> > > + dev_err(priv->dev,
> > > + "Timeout DIMM temp info creation\n");
> > > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + channels = priv->gen_info->chan_rank_max *
> > > + priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
> > > + for (i = 0, config_idx = 0; i < channels; i++)
> > > + if (priv->dimm_mask & BIT(i))
> > > + while (i >= config_idx)
> > > + priv->temp_config[config_idx++] =
> > > + HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT |
> > > + HWMON_T_MAX | HWMON_T_CRIT;
> > > +
> > > + priv->chip.ops = &dimmtemp_ops;
> > > + priv->chip.info = priv->info;
> > > +
> > > + priv->info[0] = &priv->temp_info;
> > > +
> > > + priv->temp_info.type = hwmon_temp;
> > > + priv->temp_info.config = priv->temp_config;
> > > +
> > > + hwmon_dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(priv->dev,
> > > + priv->name,
> > > + priv,
> > > + &priv->chip,
> > > + NULL);
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hwmon_dev);
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n",
> > > + dev_name(hwmon_dev), priv->name);
> > > +
> >
> > Any chance to make this consistent with the other driver ?
>
> Will change this to:
>
> if (IS_ERR(hwmon_dev)) {
> dev_err(&priv->dev, "Failed to register hwmon device\n");
> return PTR_ERR(hwmon_dev);
> }
>
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void create_dimm_temp_info_delayed(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
> > > + struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = container_of(dwork, struct
> > > peci_dimmtemp,
> > > + work_handler);
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = create_dimm_temp_info(priv);
> > > + if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN)
> > > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Failed to create DIMM temp info\n");
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int peci_dimmtemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct peci_client_manager *mgr = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > + struct peci_dimmtemp *priv;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if ((mgr->client->adapter->cmd_mask &
> > > + (BIT(PECI_CMD_GET_TEMP) | BIT(PECI_CMD_RD_PKG_CFG))) !=
> > > + (BIT(PECI_CMD_GET_TEMP) | BIT(PECI_CMD_RD_PKG_CFG)))
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!priv)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> > > + priv->mgr = mgr;
> > > + priv->dev = dev;
> > > + priv->gen_info = mgr->gen_info;
> > > +
> > > + snprintf(priv->name, PECI_NAME_SIZE, "peci_dimmtemp.cpu%d",
> > > + priv->mgr->client->addr - PECI_BASE_ADDR);
> > > +
> > > + priv->work_queue = alloc_ordered_workqueue(priv->name, 0);
> > > + if (!priv->work_queue)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&priv->work_handler,
> > > create_dimm_temp_info_delayed);
> > > +
> > > + ret = create_dimm_temp_info(priv);
> > > + if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create DIMM temp info\n");
> >
> > Does this generate error messages if there are no DIMMS ?
>
> Yes, this error message will be printed out once if it meets a timeout
> in DIMM scanning when there is no DIMM.
>
Is that indeed an error, or are there situations where no DIMMs are
detected and that is a perfectly valid situation ? An error message
is only acceptable if this is indeed an error in all situations.
Guenter
More information about the openbmc
mailing list