kernel BUG at fs/jffs2/gc.c:395!
Tao Ren
taoren at fb.com
Tue Aug 27 14:42:43 AEST 2019
On 8/25/19 3:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Von: "Tao Ren" <taoren at fb.com>
>> An: "Richard Weinberger" <richard.weinberger at gmail.com>, "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew at aj.id.au>
>> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd at lists.infradead.org>, "OpenBMC Maillist" <openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org>
>> Gesendet: Montag, 26. August 2019 00:08:08
>> Betreff: Re: kernel BUG at fs/jffs2/gc.c:395!
>
>> On 8/25/19 12:22 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:06 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au> wrote:
>>>> Looks like a lack of robustness to filesystem corruption to me. LWN
>>>
>>> What exactly makes you think so?
>>> The inode cache entry is in state INO_STATE_UNCHECKED while GC run,
>>> which is not allowed.
>>>
>>> Tao, is the error persistent or did it happen only once?
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> It rarely happens (~1 out of 1000 machines in my environment), but once it
>> happens, it's persistent: the machine will fall into reboot loop due to the
>> crash.
>
> Can you provide me an image of the filesystem such that I can have a look?
> An image where the issue is persistent...
Hi Richard,
I tried kernel image with jffs2 summary enabled and disabled, and it looks to
me the result is similar: I can reach login screen now, but the same kernel
panic happens after "reboot" command.
The behavior is a little different from what I saw yesterday: previously kernel
panic happened at boot time, and now it's after "reboot" command. I guess it's
because more node being written to the flash?
I understand it's helpful to share the file system image, but unfortunately I
cannot do it because it contains confidential data. Sorry about that..
Thank you again for the help, and kindly let me know if you have further
suggestions.
Cheers,
Tao
More information about the openbmc
mailing list