Clarify some questions about BIOS update (phosphor-ipmi-flash)
Patrick Venture
venture at google.com
Tue Aug 6 03:39:48 AEST 2019
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:39 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:32 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:17 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 4:56 AM Andrew MS1 Peng <pengms1 at lenovo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Patrick,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have some questions about BIOS update via phosphor-ipmi-flash with L2A, please help to clarify. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for giving it a shot! I don't have any systems using this for
> > > BIOS update, so I'm curious where there may be issues lurking :)
> > >
> > >
> > > > 1. How can I update the status (success or failure) after upgrade BIOS firmware? Currently, the update status only appear "running".
> > > >
> > >
> > > I see, the update mechanism doesn't have a verification option. A bit
> > > of an oversight. I'll have something up for review later today. Then
> > > it'll be something you configure similarly to the verifySystemd json
> > > entry.
> > >
> > > > 2. It was failed when triggered "phosphor-ipmi-flash-bios-update.target" since the job-mode is null string. It can work well when I add string "replace" to job-mode. How can I config (json file or configure parameter) to support it?
This patch will enable you to specify "mode" in the json. *** note: i
will set some time aside shortly to document writing json
configurations.
https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-ipmi-flash/+/24167
> > >
> > > I'll take a look! The parameter for job-mode, I thought, was
> > > optional? Since we don't specify it for other jobs (verification,
> > > etc). The string should be empty by default and then not added as a
> > > null-string:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-ipmi-flash/blob/f0c71df2514927e933f6fc33d9669ab0663a0706/bmc/update_systemd.cpp#L49
> >
> > I see it is required! Since I always configure with reboot, I never
> > saw this failure. I'll default it to "replace"
>
> First patch in the series generated from your email:
>
> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-ipmi-flash/+/24165
>
> Next: json configuration option to control the job-mode.
> Then merge verification and update objects, s.t. you can specify the
> status path.
>
> *** A later patchset can have the status be not a path, but a dbus
> property or dbus path -- if someone wants to implement a new object
> for this, it's somewhat trivial.
>
> >
> > >
> > > I don't think I have a unit-test that verifies the parameters are sent
> > > down properly, so I'll also add that today AND I'll add an optional
> > > mode parameter to the json.
> > >
> > > Sending for review today.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Andrew
More information about the openbmc
mailing list