[PATCH net-next v3] net: phy: broadcom: add 1000Base-X support for BCM54616S

Vladimir Oltean olteanv at gmail.com
Sat Aug 3 23:49:06 AEST 2019


Hi Tao,

On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 00:56, Tao Ren <taoren at fb.com> wrote:
>
> genphy_read_status() cannot report correct link speed when BCM54616S PHY
> is configured in RGMII->1000Base-KX mode (for example, on Facebook CMM
> BMC platform), and it is because speed-related fields in MII registers
> are assigned different meanings in 1000X register set. Actually there
> is no speed field in 1000X register set because link speed is always
> 1000 Mb/s.
>
> The patch adds "probe" callback to detect PHY's operation mode based on
> INTERF_SEL[1:0] pins and 1000X/100FX selection bit in SerDES 100-FX
> Control register. Besides, link speed is manually set to 1000 Mb/s in
> "read_status" callback if PHY-switch link is 1000Base-X.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ren <taoren at fb.com>
> ---
>  Changes in v3:
>   - rename bcm5482_read_status to bcm54xx_read_status so the callback can
>     be shared by BCM5482 and BCM54616S.
>  Changes in v2:
>   - Auto-detect PHY operation mode instead of passing DT node.
>   - move PHY mode auto-detect logic from config_init to probe callback.
>   - only set speed (not including duplex) in read_status callback.
>   - update patch description with more background to avoid confusion.
>   - patch #1 in the series ("net: phy: broadcom: set features explicitly
>     for BCM54616") is dropped: the fix should go to get_features callback
>     which may potentially depend on this patch.
>
>  drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/brcmphy.h    | 10 ++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
> index 937d0059e8ac..ecad8a201a09 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/broadcom.c
> @@ -383,9 +383,9 @@ static int bcm5482_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>                 /*
>                  * Select 1000BASE-X register set (primary SerDes)
>                  */
> -               reg = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM5482_SHD_MODE);
> -               bcm_phy_write_shadow(phydev, BCM5482_SHD_MODE,
> -                                    reg | BCM5482_SHD_MODE_1000BX);
> +               reg = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_MODE);
> +               bcm_phy_write_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_MODE,
> +                                    reg | BCM54XX_SHD_MODE_1000BX);
>
>                 /*
>                  * LED1=ACTIVITYLED, LED3=LINKSPD[2]
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static int bcm5482_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>         return err;
>  }
>
> -static int bcm5482_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +static int bcm54xx_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  {
>         int err;
>
> @@ -464,6 +464,35 @@ static int bcm54616s_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int bcm54616s_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +       int val, intf_sel;
> +
> +       val = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM54XX_SHD_MODE);
> +       if (val < 0)
> +               return val;
> +
> +       /* The PHY is strapped in RGMII to fiber mode when INTERF_SEL[1:0]
> +        * is 01b.
> +        */
> +       intf_sel = (val & BCM54XX_SHD_INTF_SEL_MASK) >> 1;
> +       if (intf_sel == 1) {
> +               val = bcm_phy_read_shadow(phydev, BCM54616S_SHD_100FX_CTRL);
> +               if (val < 0)
> +                       return val;
> +
> +               /* Bit 0 of the SerDes 100-FX Control register, when set
> +                * to 1, sets the MII/RGMII -> 100BASE-FX configuration.
> +                * When this bit is set to 0, it sets the GMII/RGMII ->
> +                * 1000BASE-X configuration.
> +                */
> +               if (!(val & BCM54616S_100FX_MODE))
> +                       phydev->dev_flags |= PHY_BCM_FLAGS_MODE_1000BX;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int brcm_phy_setbits(struct phy_device *phydev, int reg, int set)
>  {
>         int val;
> @@ -655,6 +684,8 @@ static struct phy_driver broadcom_drivers[] = {
>         .config_aneg    = bcm54616s_config_aneg,
>         .ack_interrupt  = bcm_phy_ack_intr,
>         .config_intr    = bcm_phy_config_intr,
> +       .read_status    = bcm54xx_read_status,
> +       .probe          = bcm54616s_probe,
>  }, {
>         .phy_id         = PHY_ID_BCM5464,
>         .phy_id_mask    = 0xfffffff0,
> @@ -689,7 +720,7 @@ static struct phy_driver broadcom_drivers[] = {
>         .name           = "Broadcom BCM5482",
>         /* PHY_GBIT_FEATURES */
>         .config_init    = bcm5482_config_init,
> -       .read_status    = bcm5482_read_status,
> +       .read_status    = bcm54xx_read_status,
>         .ack_interrupt  = bcm_phy_ack_intr,
>         .config_intr    = bcm_phy_config_intr,
>  }, {
> diff --git a/include/linux/brcmphy.h b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
> index 6db2d9a6e503..b475e7f20d28 100644
> --- a/include/linux/brcmphy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/brcmphy.h
> @@ -200,9 +200,15 @@
>  #define BCM5482_SHD_SSD                0x14    /* 10100: Secondary SerDes control */
>  #define BCM5482_SHD_SSD_LEDM   0x0008  /* SSD LED Mode enable */
>  #define BCM5482_SHD_SSD_EN     0x0001  /* SSD enable */
> -#define BCM5482_SHD_MODE       0x1f    /* 11111: Mode Control Register */
> -#define BCM5482_SHD_MODE_1000BX        0x0001  /* Enable 1000BASE-X registers */
>
> +/* 10011: SerDes 100-FX Control Register */
> +#define BCM54616S_SHD_100FX_CTRL       0x13
> +#define        BCM54616S_100FX_MODE            BIT(0)  /* 100-FX SerDes Enable */
> +
> +/* 11111: Mode Control Register */
> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_MODE               0x1f
> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_INTF_SEL_MASK      GENMASK(2, 1)   /* INTERF_SEL[1:0] */
> +#define BCM54XX_SHD_MODE_1000BX                BIT(0)  /* Enable 1000-X registers */
>
>  /*
>   * EXPANSION SHADOW ACCESS REGISTERS.  (PHY REG 0x15, 0x16, and 0x17)
> --
> 2.17.1
>

The patchset looks better now. But is it ok, I wonder, to keep
PHY_BCM_FLAGS_MODE_1000BX in phydev->dev_flags, considering that
phy_attach_direct is overwriting it?

Regards,
-Vladimir


More information about the openbmc mailing list