USB Gadget Vendor ID

[Eddie James]

On 4/12/19 10:52 AM, Adriana Kobylak wrote:
> On 2019-04-12 10:24, Eddie James wrote:
>> On 4/12/19 10:17 AM, Adriana Kobylak wrote:
>>> Hi Eddie,
>>>
>>> I have a script to initialize the USB gadget for Virtual Media and 
>>> there was a comment that the Vendor ID should be provided by the 
>>> Linux Foundation - 
>>> https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/meta-phosphor/+/17494 .
>>>
>>> In your ikvm script you use a Vendor ID with the comment "Linux 
>>> Foundation" - 
>>> https://github.com/openbmc/obmc-ikvm/blob/fb6a8e1e727a8ece5eb0350d3962dd3056a6f608/create_usbhid.sh#L18
>>>
>>> Is this an ID that came from the LF, and if so could I use it in my 
>>> script?
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since OpenBMC is a LF project, I just used their vendor ID... and I
>> just invented a serial number. This might not be the proper way to do
>> it... Since the devices are virtual, I'm not sure anyone will care
>> though?
>>
>>
> Thanks that helps. Forgot to ask about the the product id (echo 0x0104 
> > idProduct # Multifunction Composite Gadget), is it also a LF number 
> or documented somewhere?


Yes, here's the list I was using: http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids


>
>>>
>>> As a side question, were there any discussions about the serial 
>>> number value in the ikvm script? I have a similar hard-coded value 
>>> for the virtual media one but there were questions in the review 
>>> about how useful could it be having a non-generated value and to 
>>> have it removed instead.
>>
>>
>> I think there were similar comments about the serial number but in the
>> end it was decided to worry about it later I think.
>>
>> Thanks, Eddie
>