[PATCH] i2c: aspeed: fixed invalid clock parameters for very large divisors
Jae Hyun Yoo
jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com
Sat Sep 22 03:46:34 AEST 2018
Hi Brendan,
nit:
Title in imperative mood. I'd put 'fix' instead of 'fixed'.
On 9/20/2018 4:28 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> The function that computes clock parameters from divisors did not
> respect the maximum size of the bitfields that the parameters were
> written to. This fixes the bug.
>
> This bug can be reproduced with (and this fix verified with) the test
> at: https://kunit-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/+/1035/
>
> Discovered-by-KUnit: https://kunit-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/+/1035/
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins at google.com>
[....]
> + if (base_clk > ASPEED_I2CD_TIME_BASE_DIVISOR_MASK) {
> + base_clk = ASPEED_I2CD_TIME_BASE_DIVISOR_MASK;
> + clk_low = clk_high_low_mask;
> + clk_high = clk_high_low_mask;
Yes, it fixes these parameters to the lowest bus speed setting with the
maximum base clock divisor value and the maximum SCL timing cycle value
when a low bus-frequency is requested which exceeds the range of this
H/W supports. This exceptional case handling is needed to prevent making
invalid settings on it. Nice fix!
One minor issue is, 'base_clk_divisor' instead of 'base_clk' could avoid
misreading on this code.
With that, it looks nice to me. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list