New Repository Request
Brad Bishop
bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com
Wed Sep 19 08:37:00 AEST 2018
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:00 AM Brad Bishop <bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
>>
>> It might be good to have a conversation around how we handle the OpenBMC OEN
>> though. Putting things there would seem to have lasting impact for everyone
>> using OpenBMC and we don’t have any process in place for that.
>
> That's correct. So, right now, the extra handlers aren't enabled to
> be included in the image by default.
I’m more concerned with the number the end user types in when they run ipmitool.
> Someone would need to select them, which I like. As that's an opt-in behavior.
I’m not understanding the relationship between opt-in and the OEN number. In my
mind there isn’t one. Isn’t the question instead: for a given OEM extension, is
the OEN number OpenBMCs or foo-corps (irrespective of whether or not a system
integrator opts-in or opts-out of including a specific extension in their image).
> And if there’s interplay between the things, they can explicitly indicate that in
> bitbake and in a README.
>
> Consider, that each company may want to share their handlers - which I
> think is great. It enables vendors, if nothing else, and encourages
> them to switch to OpenBMC to sell hardware to IBM, Google, etc. I
> also prefer the opt-in model for features, which this fits (repeated
> point).
>
> If we share them openly and register the numbers in
> phosphor-host-ipmid, we can better enable a vendor or someone to say,
> I want to support _all_ the environments, and just flip all the
> switches. To this end, I'm considering re-submitting the oemgoog
> header to phosphor-host-ipmid, but by flagging its inclusion via a
> build-time flag. So, one could say, build a clean phosphor-host-ipmid
> by building the default, but if they --enable-google or --enable-intel
I feel like there has to be a way to do the same thing without the need for
—-enable-xyzcorp switches. I wouldn’t want to maintain that.
More information about the openbmc
mailing list