[PATCH v8 08/12] mfd: intel-peci-client: Add PECI client MFD driver
Jae Hyun Yoo
jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 26 03:16:01 AEDT 2018
On 10/24/2018 10:30 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
>> On 10/24/2018 3:59 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
>>>
>>>> This commit adds PECI client MFD driver.
>>>>
>>
>> <snip>
>
> [...]
>
>>>> +bool peci_temp_need_update(struct temp_data *temp)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (temp->valid &&
>>>> + time_before(jiffies, temp->last_updated + UPDATE_INTERVAL))
>>>> + return false;
>>>> +
>>>> + return true;
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(peci_temp_need_update);
>>>> +
>>>> +void peci_temp_mark_updated(struct temp_data *temp)
>>>> +{
>>>> + temp->valid = 1;
>>>> + temp->last_updated = jiffies;
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(peci_temp_mark_updated);
>>>
>>> These are probably better suited as inline functions to be placed in
>>> a header file. No need to export them, since they only use their own
>>> data.
>
> Also move them into the HWMON header file.
>
> They have no business in MFD.
>
Agreed. I'll move them into the HWMON header.
> [...]
>
>>>> +int peci_client_rd_pkg_cfg_cmd(struct peci_mfd *priv, u8 mbx_idx,
>>>
>>> This is gobbledegook. What's rd? Read?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, the 'rd' means 'read'. I intended to keep command names as listed
>> in the PECI specification such as RdPkgConfig, WrPkgConfig and so on.
>> Should I change it to 'peci_client_read_package_config_command' ?
>
> I looks/reads a lot nicer, don't you think?
>
Okay. I'll change it too.
Thanks again for your review, Lee!
Jae
> [...]
>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list