pull request to the u-boot-aspeed

Cédric Le Goater clg at kaod.org
Fri Nov 9 19:24:53 AEDT 2018


[ ... ]

>> Is it the reason why the OpenBMC still use v2016.07?
> We haven't found time to work on upstreaming u-boot.
> If you were to add support for the ast2400 we could move all platforms
> to the upstream tree instead. This would be preferable to maintaining
> our own fork.

One (quick) way to move forward with the support of the Aspeed 
AST2400 SoC in mainline would be to use the lowlevel init routine 
of Aspeed. 

It would give us the DRAM init which is rather complex to rewrite 
and we could use and/or extend the other drivers which are already
merged in mainline. The SPI driver is still in my branch and NC-SI 
support is missing.



More information about the openbmc mailing list