[PATCH linux dev-4.13 1/4] fsi/occ: Add retries on SBE errors
Andrew Jeffery
andrew at aj.id.au
Mon May 21 15:14:22 AEST 2018
On Fri, 18 May 2018, at 11:04, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This has proven useful in case of problems with the FSI
> communication. We retry up to 3 times.
As a note, there's a separate, OCC-specific error-handling sequence as well, but this is currently done in drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c.
>From the OCC documentation[1]:
3.3.1 BMC-OCC Communication Failure Handling
On failures communicating with an OCC the BMC should first verify that the “OCC Active” sensor is TRUE. If the OCCs are not active the error should be ignored and communication with the OCC should not be retired until the “OCC Active” sensor is TRUE. If the “OCC Active” sensor is TRUE the command should be retried twice. If the command still fails after two retries and the “OCC Active” sensor is still “TRUE” and there is no checkstop the error is valid and a request to reset the OCCs should be sent.
[1] https://github.com/open-power/docs/blob/master/occ/OCC_OpenPwr_FW_Interfaces.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> index bdee26096688..f4b2df7a3084 100644
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #define OCC_SRAM_BYTES 4096
> #define OCC_CMD_DATA_BYTES 4090
> #define OCC_RESP_DATA_BYTES 4089
> +#define OCC_COMMAND_RETRIES 3
>
> /*
> * Assume we don't have FFDC, if we do we'll overflow and
> @@ -458,9 +459,9 @@ static int occ_getsram(struct device *sbefifo, u32
> address, u8 *data,
> ssize_t len)
> {
> u32 data_len = ((len + 7) / 8) * 8; /* must be multiples of 8 B */
> - size_t resp_len, resp_data_len;
> + size_t saved_resp_len, resp_len, resp_data_len;
> __be32 *resp, cmd[5];
> - int rc;
> + int rc, retries = OCC_COMMAND_RETRIES;
>
> /*
> * Magic sequence to do SBE getsram command. SBE will fetch data from
> @@ -472,28 +473,37 @@ static int occ_getsram(struct device *sbefifo, u32
> address, u8 *data,
> cmd[3] = cpu_to_be32(address);
> cmd[4] = cpu_to_be32(data_len);
>
> - resp_len = (data_len >> 2) + OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS;
> + resp_len = saved_resp_len = (data_len >> 2) + OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS;
> resp = kzalloc(resp_len << 2 , GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!resp)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - rc = sbefifo_submit(sbefifo, cmd, 5, resp, &resp_len);
> - if (rc)
> - goto free;
> - rc = sbefifo_parse_status(0xa403, resp, resp_len, &resp_len);
> - if (rc)
> - goto free;
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + rc = -1;
> + while (rc && retries--) {
> + resp_len = saved_resp_len;
> + rc = sbefifo_submit(sbefifo, cmd, 5, resp, &resp_len);
> + if (rc == 0)
> + rc = sbefifo_parse_status(0xa403, resp, resp_len, &resp_len);
> + if (rc) {
> + if (rc < 0)
> + pr_err("occ: FSI error %d, retrying sram read\n", rc);
> + else
> + pr_err("occ: SBE error 0x%08x, retrying sram read\n", rc);
> + }
> + }
>
> - resp_data_len = be32_to_cpu(resp[resp_len - 1]);
> - if (resp_data_len != data_len) {
> - pr_err("occ: SRAM read expected %d bytes got %d\n",
> - data_len, resp_data_len);
> - rc = -EBADMSG;
> - } else {
> - memcpy(data, resp, len);
> + /* Check response lenght and copy data */
> + if (rc == 0) {
> + resp_data_len = be32_to_cpu(resp[resp_len - 1]);
> + if (resp_data_len != data_len) {
> + pr_err("occ: SRAM read expected %d bytes got %d\n",
> + data_len, resp_data_len);
> + rc = -EBADMSG;
> + } else {
> + memcpy(data, resp, len);
> + }
> }
>
> -free:
> /* Convert positive SBEI status */
> if (rc > 0) {
> pr_err("occ: SRAM read returned failure status: %08x\n", rc);
> @@ -508,8 +518,8 @@ static int occ_putsram(struct device *sbefifo, u32
> address, u8 *data,
> {
> size_t cmd_len, buf_len, resp_len, resp_data_len;
> u32 data_len = ((len + 7) / 8) * 8; /* must be multiples of 8 B */
> + int rc, retries = OCC_COMMAND_RETRIES;
> __be32 *buf;
> - int rc;
>
> /*
> * We use the same buffer for command and response, make
> @@ -522,38 +532,48 @@ static int occ_putsram(struct device *sbefifo, u32
> address, u8 *data,
> if (!buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /*
> - * Magic sequence to do SBE putsram command. SBE will transfer
> - * data to specified SRAM address.
> - */
> - buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(cmd_len);
> - buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(0xa404);
> - buf[2] = cpu_to_be32(1);
> - buf[3] = cpu_to_be32(address);
> - buf[4] = cpu_to_be32(data_len);
> -
> - memcpy(&buf[5], data, len);
> -
> - rc = sbefifo_submit(sbefifo, buf, cmd_len, buf, &resp_len);
> - if (rc)
> - goto free;
> - rc = sbefifo_parse_status(0xa404, buf, resp_len, &resp_len);
> - if (rc)
> - goto free;
> + rc = -1;
> + while (rc && retries--) {
> + /*
> + * Magic sequence to do SBE putsram command. SBE will transfer
> + * data to specified SRAM address.
> + */
> + buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(cmd_len);
> + buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(0xa404);
> + buf[2] = cpu_to_be32(1);
> + buf[3] = cpu_to_be32(address);
> + buf[4] = cpu_to_be32(data_len);
Maybe it's worth a comment that we're doing this work inside the loop because we're reusing the buffer for the response, and we're doing that to minimise the memory consumption, and it motivated by the SBEFIFO protocol crazy.
> +
> + memcpy(&buf[5], data, len);
> +
> + resp_len = OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS;
> + rc = sbefifo_submit(sbefifo, buf, cmd_len, buf, &resp_len);
> + if (rc == 0)
> + rc = sbefifo_parse_status(0xa404, buf, resp_len, &resp_len);
> + if (rc) {
> + if (rc < 0)
> + pr_err("occ: FSI error %d, retrying sram write\n", rc);
> + else
> + pr_err("occ: SBE error 0x%08x, retrying sram write\n", rc);
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (resp_len != 1) {
> - pr_err("occ: SRAM write response lenght invalid: %d\n",
> - resp_len);
> - rc = -EBADMSG;
> - } else {
> - resp_data_len = be32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> - if (resp_data_len != data_len) {
> - pr_err("occ: SRAM write expected %d bytes got %d\n",
> - data_len, resp_data_len);
> + /* Check response lenght */
> + if (rc == 0) {
> + if (resp_len != 1) {
> + pr_err("occ: SRAM write response lenght invalid: %d\n",
Hmm, not your fault but I just noticed 'length' is misspelled here.
> + resp_len);
> rc = -EBADMSG;
> + } else {
> + resp_data_len = be32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> + if (resp_data_len != data_len) {
> + pr_err("occ: SRAM write expected %d bytes got %d\n",
> + data_len, resp_data_len);
> + rc = -EBADMSG;
> + }
> }
> }
> -free:
> +
> /* Convert positive SBEI status */
> if (rc > 0) {
> pr_err("occ: SRAM write returned failure status: %08x\n", rc);
> @@ -567,46 +587,55 @@ static int occ_trigger_attn(struct device *sbefifo)
> {
> __be32 buf[OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS];
> size_t resp_len, resp_data_len;
> - int rc;
> + int rc, retries = OCC_COMMAND_RETRIES;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS < 7);
> - resp_len = OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS;
>
> - buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(0x5 + 0x2); /* Chip-op length in words */
> - buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(0xa404); /* PutOCCSRAM */
> - buf[2] = cpu_to_be32(0x3); /* Mode: Circular */
> - buf[3] = cpu_to_be32(0x0); /* Address: ignored in mode 3 */
> - buf[4] = cpu_to_be32(0x8); /* Data length in bytes */
> - buf[5] = cpu_to_be32(0x20010000); /* Trigger OCC attention */
> - buf[6] = 0;
> -
> - rc = sbefifo_submit(sbefifo, buf, 7, buf, &resp_len);
> - if (rc)
> - goto error;
> - rc = sbefifo_parse_status(0xa404, buf, resp_len, &resp_len);
> - if (rc)
> - goto error;
> + rc = -1;
> + while (rc && retries--) {
> + resp_len = OCC_SBE_STATUS_WORDS;
> +
> + buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(0x5 + 0x2); /* Chip-op length in words */
> + buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(0xa404); /* PutOCCSRAM */
> + buf[2] = cpu_to_be32(0x3); /* Mode: Circular */
> + buf[3] = cpu_to_be32(0x0); /* Address: ignored in mode 3 */
> + buf[4] = cpu_to_be32(0x8); /* Data length in bytes */
> + buf[5] = cpu_to_be32(0x20010000); /* Trigger OCC attention */
> + buf[6] = 0;
> +
> + rc = sbefifo_submit(sbefifo, buf, 7, buf, &resp_len);
> + if (rc == 0)
> + rc = sbefifo_parse_status(0xa404, buf, resp_len, &resp_len);
> + if (rc) {
> + if (rc < 0)
> + pr_err("occ: FSI error %d, retrying attn\n", rc);
> + else
> + pr_err("occ: SBE error 0x%08x, retrying attn\n", rc);
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (resp_len != 1) {
> - pr_err("occ: SRAM attn response lenght invalid: %d\n",
> - resp_len);
> - rc = -EBADMSG;
> - } else {
> - resp_data_len = be32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> - if (resp_data_len != 8) {
> - pr_err("occ: SRAM attn expected 8 bytes got %d\n",
> - resp_data_len);
> + /* Check response lenght */
'length'
> + if (rc == 0) {
> + if (resp_len != 1) {
> + pr_err("occ: SRAM attn response lenght invalid: %d\n",
'length'
> + resp_len);
> rc = -EBADMSG;
> + } else {
> + resp_data_len = be32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> + if (resp_data_len != 8) {
> + pr_err("occ: SRAM attn expected 8 bytes got %d\n",
> + resp_data_len);
> + rc = -EBADMSG;
> + }
> }
> }
> - error:
> +
> /* Convert positive SBEI status */
> if (rc > 0) {
> pr_err("occ: SRAM attn returned failure status: %08x\n", rc);
> rc = -EBADMSG;
> }
>
> -
> return rc;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list