Merging up to OpenBMC v2.2 from v2.1 - boot problem, invalid ramdisk format
Patrick Venture
venture at google.com
Thu Jun 28 00:38:58 AEST 2018
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, at 01:49, Patrick Venture wrote:
>> I assume this is just a recipe change such that I need to now specify
>> something -- with OpenBMC v2.1 I see:
>>
>> """
>> U-Boot 2016.07 (May 24 2018 - 12:55:55 -0700)
>>
>> DRAM: 120 MiB
>> WARNING: Caches not enabled
>> Flash: 64 MiB
>> *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
>>
>> In: serial
>> Out: serial
>> Err: serial
>> Net: aspeednic#0
>> Error: aspeednic#0 address not set.
>>
>> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
>> ## Loading kernel from FIT Image at 20080000 ...
>> Using 'conf at 1' configuration
>> Trying 'kernel at 1' kernel subimage
>> Description: Linux kernel
>> Type: Kernel Image
>> Compression: uncompressed
>> Data Start: 0x20080128
>> Data Size: 1721352 Bytes = 1.6 MiB
>> Architecture: ARM
>> OS: Linux
>> Load Address: 0x40008000
>> Entry Point: 0x40008000
>> Hash algo: sha1
>> Hash value: de140d9d803c22f731c4d99a4250979489383a81
>> Verifying Hash Integrity ... sha1+ OK
>> ## Loading ramdisk from FIT Image at 20080000 ...
>> Using 'conf at 1' configuration
>> Trying 'ramdisk at 1' ramdisk subimage
>> Description: obmc-phosphor-initramfs
>> Type: RAMDisk Image
>> Compression: lzma compressed
>> Data Start: 0x2022ad00
>> Data Size: 1592362 Bytes = 1.5 MiB
>> Architecture: ARM
>> OS: Linux
>> Load Address: unavailable
>> Entry Point: unavailable
>> Hash algo: sha1
>> Hash value: 9f6f2feb110e27e07f81bb60bb372b4083672f19
>> Verifying Hash Integrity ... sha1+ OK
>> ## Loading fdt from FIT Image at 20080000 ...
>> Using 'conf at 1' configuration
>> Trying 'fdt at 1' fdt subimage
>> Description: Flattened Device Tree blob
>> Type: Flat Device Tree
>> Compression: uncompressed
>> Data Start: 0x20224624
>> Data Size: 26139 Bytes = 25.5 KiB
>> Architecture: ARM
>> Hash algo: sha1
>> Hash value: 37864a4c4a608d5f4e370bbccf93ccbe3e77462d
>> Verifying Hash Integrity ... sha1+ OK
>> Booting using the fdt blob at 0x20224624
>> Loading Kernel Image ... OK
>> Loading Ramdisk to 47213000, end 47397c2a ... OK
>> Loading Device Tree to 47209000, end 4721261a ... OK
>>
>> Starting kernel ...
>> """
>>
>> With v2.2 I see:
>> """
>> U-Boot 2016.07 (Jun 25 2018 - 10:07:57 -0700)
>>
>> DRAM: 120 MiB
>> WARNING: Caches not enabled
>> Flash: 64 MiB
>> *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
>>
>> In: serial
>> Out: serial
>> Err: serial
>> Net: aspeednic#0
>> Error: aspeednic#0 address not set.
>>
>> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
>> libfdt fdt_path_offset() returned FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND
>
> From below it looks like u-boot finds the kernel in the FIT, but your ramdisk is "corrupt". The error above suggests something is missing from the FIT. Can you check the initrd/ramdisk node in your FIT to make sure it is present and uses all the correct options and paths with respect to the initrd you intended to package?
I'll take a look -- one thought I had last night is that now the
kernel config bit above is using the dts -- and IIRC, there have been
changes to the flash layout. So, maybe my device tree being used here
is out-of-date or doesn't match what it's expecting now. I'm still on
the 4.7.10 kernel as I haven't had a chance to get the host booted
with 4.13 (although that's high on my todo list).
>
> Might also be helpful to provide the content of the .its file.
>
>> ## Loading kernel from FIT Image at 20080000 ...
>> Using 'conf at aspeed-bmc-quanta-q71l.dtb' configuration
>> Trying 'kernel at 1' kernel subimage
>> Description: Linux kernel
>> Type: Kernel Image
>> Compression: uncompressed
>> Data Start: 0x20080124
>> Data Size: 1723192 Bytes = 1.6 MiB
>> Architecture: ARM
>> OS: Linux
>> Load Address: 0x40008000
>> Entry Point: 0x40008000
>> Hash algo: sha1
>> Hash value: 95ed76c9361d9f6f991a6a859a06eb7626af80df
>> Verifying Hash Integrity ... sha1+ OK
>> Wrong Ramdisk Image Format
>> Ramdisk image is corrupt or invalid
>> """
>>
>> I figured I'd reach out first as I'm sure this will be familiar to someone :D
>>
>> Patrick
More information about the openbmc
mailing list