[PATCH linux dev-4.17 1/7] clk: Aspeed: Modify clk-aspeed.c driver probe sequence
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Jul 17 19:45:13 AEST 2018
On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:04 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 03:47:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 13:17 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > In Aspeed's SoC, all IP clk gating and pll parameter is in scu
> > > controller, before IP driver probe, scu driver need prepare for it.
> > > So buildin_platform_driver to core_initcall.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryanchen.aspeed at gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c b/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > index 8796b8a..9e55743 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > @@ -573,7 +573,12 @@ static struct platform_driver aspeed_clk_driver = {
> > > .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > > },
> > > };
> > > -builtin_platform_driver(aspeed_clk_driver);
> > > +
> > > +static int __init aspeed_clk_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + return platform_driver_register(&aspeed_clk_driver);
> > > +}
> > > +core_initcall(aspeed_clk_init);
> > >
> > > static void __init aspeed_ast2400_cc(struct regmap *map)
> > > {
> >
> > It's generally considered dangerous to register drivers at core
> > initcall time.
>
> Understand.
>
> But if interrupt controller have clk gating.
> the scu driver should be eraly than irq chip driver probe.
> Is this point is reasonable?
I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to solve other than
making sure the clock driver is loaded before everything else. Joel, do
we have a way to ensure that ? I noticed all other clock drivers use
that macro to be initialized at of_clk_init, any reason we don't ?
>
> >
> > Any reason we don't use the generic clock driver registration mechanism
> > that runs at of_clk_init() time ?
>
> I will use "if (gate->reset_idx == aspeed_resets[ASPEED_RESET_SDHCI])",
> is it suitable ?
I'm on holiday, I don't have the code at hand to check. Joel ? What do
you reckon ?
>
> Ryan Chen
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ben.
> >
More information about the openbmc
mailing list