[PATCH RFC v2 1/2] Documentation/devicetree: Add specification for FSI busses

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Mon May 22 23:10:23 AEST 2017

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:51:24PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> This change introduces a proposed layout for describing FSI busses in
> the device tree. While the bus is probe-able, we'd still like a method
> of describing subordinate (eg i2c) busses that are behind FSI devices.
> The FSI core will be responsible for matching probed slaves & engines to
> their device tree nodes, so the FSI device drivers' probe() functions
> will be passed a struct device with the appropriate of_node populated
> where a matching DT node is found.

Missed this the first time, "dt-bindings: fsi: " is the preferred 
subject prefix. No need to respin just for that.

> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk at ozlabs.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>

More information about the openbmc mailing list