[PATCH linux dev-4.7] drivers/fsi: Flag FSI bus errors with dev_err( )
Christopher Bostic
cbostic at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Mar 10 01:10:12 AEDT 2017
On 3/9/17 4:51 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Christopher Bostic
> <cbostic at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Currently not seeing details of any FSI bus errors that may
>> occur. Send info via dev_err so that the type of FSI bus fail
>> can be determined.
> Are these really errors for normal users of the system?
>
> I think these will only be useful for FSI developers. Use the dynamic
> debug system for having developer errors.
Hi Joel,
I suppose there are two different situations where this error info would
be useful. First during developer debug and bringup which would sound
more like a candidate for the dynamic debug system you mention. Second
case is after all firmware bugs have been ironed out and we have general
system errors related to hardware fails. Is that a developer error or
info for users. To me that would be more for normal users of the system.
Thanks
-Chris.
>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Bostic <cbostic at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c
>> index 49f3399..c2f2fe2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c
>> @@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master, uint8_t expected,
>> break;
>> }
>> if (i >= FSI_GPIO_MTOE_COUNT) {
>> - dev_dbg(master->master.dev,
>> - "Master time out waiting for response\n");
>> + dev_err(master->master.dev,
>> + "MTOE: Master time out waiting for response\n");
>> drain_response(master);
>> fsi_master_gpio_error(master, FSI_GPIO_MTOE);
>> return -EIO;
>> @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master, uint8_t expected,
>>
>> case FSI_GPIO_RESP_ERRA:
>> case FSI_GPIO_RESP_ERRC:
>> - dev_dbg(master->master.dev, "ERR received: %d\n",
>> - (int)response.msg);
>> + dev_err(master->master.dev, "ERRA/C received: %d\n",
>> + response_id);
>> /*
>> * todo: Verify crc from slave and in general
>> * only act on any response if crc is correct
>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master, uint8_t expected,
>> /* Read in the crc and check it */
>> serial_in(master, &response, FSI_GPIO_CRC_SIZE);
>> if (crc_in != response.msg) {
>> - dev_dbg(master->master.dev, "ERR response CRC\n");
>> + dev_err(master->master.dev, "ERR response CRC\n");
>> fsi_master_gpio_error(master, FSI_GPIO_CRC_INVAL);
>> return -EIO;
>> }
>> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master, uint8_t expected,
>>
>> } while (busy_count++ < FSI_GPIO_MAX_BUSY);
>>
>> - dev_dbg(master->master.dev, "ERR slave is stuck in busy state\n");
>> + dev_err(master->master.dev, "ERR slave is stuck in busy state\n");
>> fsi_master_gpio_error(master, FSI_GPIO_ERR_BUSY);
>>
>> return -EIO;
>> --
>> 1.8.2.2
>>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list