[PATCH linux dev-4.10 v2 4/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: quanta-q71l: PDB FRU and mux on the PDB in front of the PSUs.
Joel Stanley
joel at jms.id.au
Tue Jun 20 12:15:39 AEST 2017
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
> Joel;
>
> Thanks! This was my first patch email series, so I appreciate your
> help.
No worries. You're doing a great job; keep the patches flowing.
> So I ran into something last night while reviewing something
> that jumped out at me. I'll need to send a new patch for the quanta
> dts momentarily to address this. In linux-4.7 the i2c-mux driver
> pca9546 had a different compatibility string from 4.10. Since we
> don't own those devices on our BMC image in testing (we're mastering
> them from the host via i2c over IPMI), So, let me submit a patch to
> fix that.
Cool. How are you going with the move to 4.10? Do you have a list of
drivers and tweaks that you need to get ticked off before you update?
One of my goals to help everyone stay on the latest kernel. Having
your changes in the tree sooner means the move to the next kernel tree
(probably 4.12?) will be easier.
Cheers,
Joel
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au> wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-quanta-q71l.dts | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>>
>> I had some issues with conflicts between the 4 patch series and the
>> two patches you'd sent before then. So merged all of your device tree
>> changes for the Q71L as one patch.
>>
>> Next time you're sending changes that may conflict, put them all in
>> the same series. It's okay to send a v2 of the series with additional
>> patches added.
>>
>> Also, in the case of your patch #4 where you needed to make a fix,
>> it's convention to re-send the entire series. No worries this time
>> though, I got it sorted in the end.
>>
>> I noticed we did not have the dts added to the Makefile, so it was not
>> building. I fixed that too. Please take a look a the tree and make
>> sure all of the device tree nodes are in there as you expect them to
>> be.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Joel
>>
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-quanta-q71l.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-quanta-q71l.dts
>>> index 4b5047b5d592..2b01c5bcc88b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-quanta-q71l.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-quanta-q71l.dts
>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
>>> * SSD 1,
>>> * SSD 2
>>> */
>>> - i2cswitch at 77 {
>>> + i2c-switch at 77 {
>>> compatible = "pca9548";
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> @@ -177,6 +177,24 @@
>>>
>>> &i2c7 {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + /* 0: PSU4
>>> + * PSU1
>>> + * PSU3
>>> + * PSU2
>>> + */
>>> + i2c-switch at 70 {
>>> + compatible = "pca9546";
>>> + reg = <0x70>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + /* PDB FRU */
>>> + eeprom at 52 {
>>> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
>>> + reg = <0x52>;
>>> + };
>>> };
>>>
>>> &i2c8 {
>>> --
>>> 2.13.1.518.g3df882009-goog
>>>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list