Target name refactoring
Rick Altherr
raltherr at google.com
Sat Feb 25 03:41:04 AEDT 2017
nit: stop is a verb. Stopped is a state.
On Feb 24, 2017 5:59 AM, "Brad Bishop" <bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 21, 2017, at 10:00 PM, Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Andrew Geissler <geissonator at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Some design decisions came out of my last set of changes in the
> >> OpenBMC state area. There was a proposal to rename our targets
> >> responsible for booting and powering on/off the system.
> >>
> >> Currently we have this:
> >> - PowerOn: obmc-power-chassis-on.target obmc-chassis-start.target
> >> - PowerOff: obmc-power-chassis-off.target obmc-chassis-stop.target
> >> obmc-stop-host.target
> >>
> >> The obmc-power-chassis-*.targets are responsible for doing whatever is
> >> required to apply pgood to the chassis.
> >> The obmc-chassis-*.targets are responsible for starting and stopping
> >> all host related services
> >> The obmc-stop-host.target is where we have the soft power off service
> >> (notify host of shutdown, wait for host to shutdown gracefully)
> >>
> >> Refactoring Proposal:
> >> - First the chassis-start and chassis-stop target names don’t make
> >> sense anymore with the new bmc, chassis, and host state break down’s
> >> so:
> >> - Rename obmc-chassis-start.target to obmc-start-host.target
> >> - Rename obmc-chassis-stop.target to obmc-stop-host.target
> >> - Rename the current obmc-stop-host.target to obmc-shutdown-host.target
> >
> > Can I suggest putting the host before the action?
> >
> > obmc-host-stop
> > obmc-host-start
> > obmc-host-shutdown
>
> We have two types of targets, synchronization targets (for example
> network-pre.target),
> and action targets(for example multi-user.target). Sync targets are not
> directly
> start/stoppable - they have to be started implicitly by systemd. I would
> like a way
> to be able to tell which one I am looking at from the name. For example:
>
> obmc-stop-host # Action - stop the host.
> obmc-host-stop # Sync - the host has been stopped.
>
> I had proposed this obmc-[verb]-[what] for actions and obmc-[what]-[state]
> to Andrew
> privately..I’m fine with something else, again, as long as it is
> consistent.
>
> I can think of two conventions:
>
> obmc-[verb]-[what] for actions
> obmc-[what]-[state] for sync points
>
> or
>
> obmc-[what]-[verb] for actions
> obmc-[what]-[state] for sync points
>
> Either one is fine with me. The former seems slightly easier to
> distinguish between
> the two.
>
> >
> >>
> >> The target relationships are then the following:
> >>
> >> obmc-host-start.target requires obmc-power-chassis-on.target
> >> obmc-shutdown-host.target requires obmc-stop-host.target requires
> >> obmc-power-chassis-off.target
> >
> > obmc-host-start requires obmc-chassis-poweron
> >
> > obmc-host-shutdown requires obmc-host-stop requires obmc-chassis-poweroff
> >
> > I think the rest of your proposal sounds good, from what I understand.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Joel
> >
> >>
> >> When a system goes to the quiesce target, the host state manager will
> >> call the obmc-stop-host.target. Otherwise, the host state service
> >> will call the obmc-shutdown-host.target when power off is requested.
> >>
> >> Thoughts/Comments?
> >> Andrew
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20170224/32a3b29b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list