[PATCH linux dev-4.10] hwmon: (ucd9000) Add user space access of status and config
Christopher Bostic
cbostic at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Aug 11 05:38:36 AEST 2017
On 8/9/17 11:48 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 20:34 -0500, Christopher Bostic wrote:
>> Create sysfs files to export status_word, status_vout, gpio_config
>> and other properties of the ucd90160 device. There are separate
>> files for each parsed bit.
>>
>> Note that status_word and ton / toff has not yet been moved
>> into the pmbus core. Once the final decision from the community
>> has been received I'll updating.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christopher Bostic <cbostic at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c | 390 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 389 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c
>> index 3e3aa95..f384a39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ucd9000.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c/pmbus.h>
>> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>> #include "pmbus.h"
>>
>> enum chips { ucd9000, ucd90120, ucd90124, ucd90160, ucd9090, ucd90910 };
>> @@ -34,6 +36,10 @@
>>> #define UCD9000_NUM_PAGES 0xd6
>>> #define UCD9000_FAN_CONFIG_INDEX 0xe7
>>> #define UCD9000_FAN_CONFIG 0xe8
>>> +#define UCD9000_LOGGED_FAULTS 0xea
>>> +#define UCD9000_MFR_STATUS 0xf3
>>> +#define UCD9000_GPIO_SELECT 0xfa
>>> +#define UCD9000_GPIO_CONFIG 0xfb
>>> #define UCD9000_DEVICE_ID 0xfd
>>
>>> #define UCD9000_MON_TYPE(x) (((x) >> 5) & 0x07)
>> @@ -119,6 +125,378 @@ static int ucd9000_read_byte_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg)
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ucd9000_id);
>>
>> +static ssize_t ucd9000_clear_faults(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
>>> + size_t count)
>> +{
>>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> +
>>> + pmbus_clear_faults(client);
>> +
>>> + return count;
>> +}
> Eddie was exposing this in the core. I don't think we should need to
> carry it here.
Hi Andrew,
OK will use the interface Eddie is using for this.
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ucd9000_clear_logged_faults(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
>>> + size_t count)
>> +{
>>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>> + int ret;
>> +
>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, UCD9000_LOGGED_FAULTS, 0);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to clear logged faults\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ucd9000_mfr_status(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *sensor_attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(attr);
>>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>> + int nr = sensor_attr->index, ret;
>>> + u32 block_buffer;
>> +
>>> + ret = pmbus_set_page(client, 0);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "i2c_smbus_write failed. rc:%d\n", ret);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, UCD9000_MFR_STATUS,
>>> + (u8 *)&block_buffer);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>>> + "Failed to read mfr status. rc:%d\n", ret);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%1d\n", ret & BIT(nr) ? 1 : 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ucd9000_gpi_config(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *sensor_attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(attr);
>>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>> + int nr = (sensor_attr->index & 0xf00) >> 8;
>> + int reg = sensor_attr->index & 0xff, ret;
> Do we need to set the page?
>
I don't believe so. GPIO select and config are listed as common scope
in the ucd90XXX spec.
>> +
>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, UCD9000_GPIO_SELECT, reg);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to set gpio select %d\n", reg);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, UCD9000_GPIO_CONFIG);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>>> + "Failed to read gpi%02d config\n", reg);
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%1d\n", ret & BIT(nr) ? 1 : 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ucd9000_status_vout(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *sensor_attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(attr);
>>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>> + int nr = (sensor_attr->index & 0xf00) >> 8;
>>> + int page = sensor_attr->index & 0xff, ret;
>> +
>>> + ret = pmbus_set_page(client, page);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "i2c_smbus_write failed. page:%d rc:%d\n",
>>> + page, ret);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, PMBUS_STATUS_VOUT);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>>> + "Failed to read status_vout(%d) rc:%d\n", page, ret);
>> + }
> The set_page()/read_byte() dance can be performed with
> pmbus_read_byte_data()
OK will change.
>
>> +
>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%1d", ret & BIT(nr) ? 1 : 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ucd9000_status_word(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *sensor_attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(attr);
>>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>>> + int nr = sensor_attr->index, ret;
>> +
>>> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&client->dev,
>>> + "Failed to read number of active pages\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>> +
>>> + return sprintf(buf, "%1d", ret & BIT(nr) ? 1 : 0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(clear_faults, 0200, NULL, ucd9000_clear_faults);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(clear_logged_faults, 0200,
>>> + NULL, ucd9000_clear_logged_faults);
>> +
>> +/* MFR status */
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi8_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 23);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi7_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 22);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi6_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 21);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi5_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 20);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi4_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 19);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi3_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 18);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi2_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 17);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpi1_fault, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 16);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(new_logged_fault_detail, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 12);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(system_watchdog_timeout, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 11);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(store_default_all_error, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 10);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(store_default_all_done, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 9);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(watchdog_timeout, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 8);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(invalid_logs, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 7);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(logged_fault_detail, 0444,
>>> + ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 6);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(resequence_error, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 5);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pkgid_mismatch, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 4);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(hardcoded_parms, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 3);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(seq_off_timeout, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 2);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(seq_on_timeout, 0444, ucd9000_mfr_status, NULL, 1);
> Is this impacted by the debugfs approach that Eddie's developing?
Yes, this would be covered in the core with Eddie's change, will remove.
>> +
>> +/* GPIO config */
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio8_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config, NULL, 8);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio8_out_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0108);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio8_out_val, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0208);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio8_stat, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0308);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio9_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config, NULL, 9);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio9_out_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0109);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio9_out_val, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0209);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio9_stat, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0309);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio10_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config, NULL, 10);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio10_out_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x010a);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio10_out_val, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x020a);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio10_stat, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x030a);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio11_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config, NULL, 11);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio11_out_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x010b);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio11_out_val, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x020b);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio11_stat, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x030b);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio14_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config, NULL, 14);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio14_out_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x010e);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio14_out_val, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x020e);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio14_stat, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x030e);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio17_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config, NULL, 17);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio17_out_enab, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0111);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio17_out_val, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>>> + NULL, 0x0211);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(gpio17_stat, 0444, ucd9000_gpi_config,
>> + NULL, 0x0311);
> Seems like it should implement a gpio_chip?
Was considering that - will look into adding.
>> +
>> +
>> +/* Status VOUT : Should be moved to PMBUS core */
> Did you investigate implementing these in the PMBus core? If so, why
> didn't you take that route? If not, why not?
I was intending to implement in the core but after spending some time on
what method to use, and given Eddie's parallel efforts here, I first I
wanted to have the functionality at least available locally. This can
be removed with the other new core additions.
>
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton1_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0201);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff1_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0101);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton2_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0202);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff2_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0102);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton3_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0203);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff3_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0103);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton4_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0204);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff4_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0104);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton5_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0205);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff5_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0105);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton6_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0206);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff6_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0106);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton7_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0207);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff7_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0107);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton8_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0208);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff8_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0108);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton9_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0209);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff9_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0109);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton10_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x020a);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff10_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x010a);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton11_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x020b);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff11_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x010b);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton12_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x020c);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff12_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x010c);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton13_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x020d);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff13_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x010d);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton14_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x020e);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff14_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x010e);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton15_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x020f);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff15_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x010f);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(ton16_max_fault, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0210);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(toff16_max_warning, 0444, ucd9000_status_vout,
>>> + NULL, 0x0110);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Status Word
>> + * Why is this not in the core? In process of being added to pmbus core
>> + * but for the mean time its local for testing purposes
>> + */
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(misc_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 0);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(cml_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 1);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(vout_crit_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 5);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(off_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 6);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(fans_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 10);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pgood_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 11);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(mfr_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 12);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(vout_alarm, 0444, ucd9000_status_word, NULL, 15);
> So Eddie's patch addresses some of these - can you please rework your
> patch in terms of his?
Yes will do that.
Thanks
-Chris
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew
>
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *ucd9000_attributes[] = {
>>> + &dev_attr_clear_faults.attr,
>>> + &dev_attr_clear_logged_faults.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_misc_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_cml_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_vout_crit_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_off_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_fans_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_pgood_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_mfr_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_vout_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi8_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi7_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi6_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi5_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi4_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi3_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi2_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpi1_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_new_logged_fault_detail.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_system_watchdog_timeout.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_store_default_all_error.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_store_default_all_done.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_watchdog_timeout.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_invalid_logs.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_logged_fault_detail.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_resequence_error.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_pkgid_mismatch.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_hardcoded_parms.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_seq_off_timeout.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_seq_on_timeout.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio8_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio8_out_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio8_out_val.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio8_stat.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio9_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio9_out_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio9_out_val.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio9_stat.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio10_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio10_out_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio10_out_val.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio10_stat.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio11_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio11_out_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio11_out_val.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio11_stat.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio14_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio14_out_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio14_out_val.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio14_stat.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio17_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio17_out_enab.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio17_out_val.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_gpio17_stat.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff1_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff2_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff3_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff4_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff5_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff6_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff7_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff8_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff9_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff10_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff11_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff12_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff13_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff14_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff15_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_toff16_max_warning.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton1_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton2_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton3_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton4_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton5_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton6_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton7_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton8_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton9_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton10_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton11_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton12_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton13_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton14_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton15_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + &sensor_dev_attr_ton16_max_fault.dev_attr.attr,
>>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group ucd9000_attr_group = {
>>> + .attrs = ucd9000_attributes,
>> +};
>> +
>> static int ucd9000_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -227,16 +605,26 @@ static int ucd9000_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>> | PMBUS_HAVE_FAN34 | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_FAN34;
>>> }
>>
>>> + ret = sysfs_create_group(&client->dev.kobj, &ucd9000_attr_group);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + return ret;
>> +
>>> return pmbus_do_probe(client, mid, info);
>> }
>>
>> +static int ucd9000_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>>> + sysfs_remove_group(&client->dev.kobj, &ucd9000_attr_group);
>>> + return pmbus_do_remove(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* This is the driver that will be inserted */
>> static struct i2c_driver ucd9000_driver = {
>>> .driver = {
>>> .name = "ucd9000",
>>> },
>>> .probe = ucd9000_probe,
>>> - .remove = pmbus_do_remove,
>>> + .remove = ucd9000_remove,
>>> .id_table = ucd9000_id,
>> };
>>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list