[patch v3 resend] Documentation: dt-bindings: aspeed-pwm-tacho cooling device.

[Guenter Roeck]

On 08/09/2017 12:15 AM, Mykola Kostenok wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:linux at roeck-us.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 7:09 AM
>> To: Mykola Kostenok <c_mykolak at mellanox.com>; Rob Herring
>> <robh+dt at kernel.org>; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Jaghathiswari Rankappagounder Natarajan <jaghu at google.com>;
>> openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org; Patrick Venture <venture at google.com>; Vadim
>> Pasternak <vadimp at mellanox.com>; Ohad Oz <ohado at mellanox.com>
>> Subject: Re: [patch v3 resend] Documentation: dt-bindings: aspeed-pwm-
>> tacho cooling device.
>>
>> On 08/03/2017 01:46 AM, Mykola Kostenok wrote:
>>> It's add support for cooling device creation to aspeed-pwm-tacho.
>>> Cooling device could be bound to a thermal zone for the thermal
>>> control.
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>    - Fix commit message.
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>    Pointed out by Rob Herring:
>>>    - Put cooling-levels under fan subnodes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mykola Kostenok <c_mykolak at mellanox.com>
>>
>> Did Rob ever Ack this patch ?
>>
>> Note you didn't copy the hwmon mailing list, which doesn't exactly help to
>> keep track of it, and I may have lost Rob's Ack. My apologies if that is the
>> case.
>>
>> Guenter
> 
> Hi, Guenter.
> 
> No, Rob Herring did not ack patch yet. Just comment.
> 
> Yes, since I split initial patch to 2 patches, I have sent one to you and hwmon mail list,
> and another to Rob and devicetree mail list. And added you both to cc.
> Am I need to add both mail lists to both patches in such cases?
> 

Normally the dt patch would still be pushed through the same subsystem as the driver,
so, yes, it would be useful to have hwmon copied. Otherwise it won't be in the hwmon
patchwork and can easily get lost.

Guenter