[PATCH docs] Add Gerrit server info to contributing doc

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 21:08 -0500, Patrick Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:21:57AM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 08:50 -0500, OpenBMC Patches wrote:
> > Are we planning to list the projects that are using Gerrit here as
> > well? I understand there's only a test project at the moment, but just
> > wanted to clarify.
> > 
> I don't believe so.  The intention is that the majority are there and I
> don't think we should maintain a list of them.  It would be more
> straight-forward to maintain a list of ones NOT there.
> 

Sure. Either way I think we should do something to document that we
have different workflows for different repos (this change is fine as is
though). This gives us something to point at when people ask. I'm just
trying to keep in mind the points raised in LWN's drive-through-
contributions article[1].

Cheers,

Andrew

[1] https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/688560/9fa49b203bb0997d/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20160621/9699bbc2/attachment.sig>