Redfish or Irrelevance?
Norman James
njames at us.ibm.com
Fri Feb 12 00:10:04 AEDT 2016
There is no question that OpenBMC should support Redfish in the near
future. We were hoping someone outside might help implement Redfish as
OpenBMC got traction.
Regards,
Norman James
IBM - POWER Systems Architect
Phone: 1-512-286-6807 (T/L: 363-6807)
Internet: njames at us.ibm.com
From: Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: openbmc <openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org>
Date: 02/11/2016 01:14 AM
Subject: Redfish or Irrelevance?
Sent by: "openbmc" <openbmc-bounces+njames=us.ibm.com at lists.ozlabs.org>
So, it seems that the standard RESTful API to BMCs is RedFish. With HP,
Intel, Dell and others on board (with at least HP iLO shipping product).
There's already an OpenStack Ironic driver for Redfish and a bunch of
other tooling.
It feels that not going this route would paint us into a corner of
irrelevance and being the tricky platform to deal with.
See https://www.dmtf.org/standards/redfish
thoughts?
--
Stewart Smith
OPAL Architect, IBM.
_______________________________________________
openbmc mailing list
openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/openbmc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20160211/98bdd135/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20160211/98bdd135/attachment.gif>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list