[PATCH phosphor-rest-server] Add self-signed cert

[Patrick Williams]

Yes.  That is fine.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:50:50AM -0500, Brad Bishop wrote:
> I just opened issue https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-rest-server/issues/5 <https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-rest-server/issues/5>
> to track that.
> 
> Can we settle for this in the short term?
> 
> > On Nov 13, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Brad Bishop <bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > At the moment we don’t have any cert at all.  Baby steps...
> > 
> >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:10:24AM -0500, OpenBMC Patches wrote:
> >>> Eventually will be running with SSL.
> >>> 
> >>> https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-rest-server/pull/4
> >>> 
> >>> Brad Bishop (1):
> >>> Add self-signed cert
> >>> 
> >>> cert.pem | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 
> >> Why aren't we generating a new self-signed certificate on the machine
> >> instead of including a global one here in the package?  It seems like at
> >> a minimum we should generate a new one on each build.
> >> 
> >>> setup.py |  6 ++++--
> >>> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 cert.pem
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> 2.6.3
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> openbmc mailing list
> >>> openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org
> >>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/openbmc
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Patrick Williams
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> openbmc mailing list
> >> openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org
> >> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/openbmc
> > 
> 

-- 
Patrick Williams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20151113/f617a725/attachment.sig>