[PATCH] Avoid use of uninitialised spinlock in EEH.
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Thu Sep 22 03:14:59 EST 2005
If the kernel supports both G5 and pSeries, and CONFIG_EEH is enabled,
eeh_init() is (quite reasonably) never called when we boot on a G5. Yet
eeh_check_failure() still gets called. We should avoid doing that if
!eeh_subsystem_enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
--- linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc64/eeh.h~ 2005-09-21 16:36:23.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc64/eeh.h 2005-09-21 17:41:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ struct notifier_block;
#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
+extern int eeh_subsystem_enabled;
+
/* Values for eeh_mode bits in device_node */
#define EEH_MODE_SUPPORTED (1<<0)
#define EEH_MODE_NOCHECK (1<<1)
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ int eeh_unregister_notifier(struct notif
* If this macro yields TRUE, the caller relays to eeh_check_failure()
* which does further tests out of line.
*/
-#define EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val, type) ((val) == (type)~0)
+#define EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val, type) (eeh_subsystem_enabled && (val) == (type)~0)
/*
* Reads from a device which has been isolated by EEH will return
--- linux-2.6.13/arch/ppc64/kernel/eeh.c~ 2005-09-21 16:35:49.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/ppc64/kernel/eeh.c 2005-09-21 17:40:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ static int ibm_read_slot_reset_state;
static int ibm_read_slot_reset_state2;
static int ibm_slot_error_detail;
-static int eeh_subsystem_enabled;
+int eeh_subsystem_enabled;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(eeh_subsystem_enabled);
/* Buffer for reporting slot-error-detail rtas calls */
static unsigned char slot_errbuf[RTAS_ERROR_LOG_MAX];
--
dwmw2
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list