[PATCH] PPC64: large INITRD causes kernel not to boot [UPDATE]
Paul Mackerras
paulus at samba.org
Wed Sep 7 09:42:13 EST 2005
Mark Bellon writes:
> Simply put the existing code has a fixed reservation (claim) address and
> once the kernel plus initrd image are large enough to pass this address
> all sorts of bad things occur. The fix is the dynamically establish the
> first claim address above the loaded kernel plus initrd (plus some
> "padding" and rounding). If PROG_START is defined this will be used as
> the minimum safe address - currently known to be 0x01400000 for the
> firmwares tested so far.
The idea is fine, but I have some questions about the actual patch:
> -void *claim(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int);
> +void *claim(unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
What was the motivation for this change? Since the zImage wrapper is
a 32-bit executable, int and long are both 32 bits. I would prefer to
leave the parameters as unsigned int to force people to realize that
the parameters are 32 bits (even if said people have been working on
64-bit programs recently).
> + claim_base = _ALIGN_UP((unsigned long)_end, ONE_MB);
> +
> +#if defined(PROG_START)
> + /*
> + * Maintain a "magic" minimum address. This keeps some older
> + * firmware platforms running.
> + */
> +
> + if (claim_base < PROG_START)
> + claim_base = PROG_START;
> +#endif
This appears to be the meat of the patch, the rest is "cleanup",
right?
Paul.
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list