[RFC] Old paca being written by firmware after kexec

[Michael Ellerman]

On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 01:05, Milton Miller wrote:
> i'd rather each cpu do it in kexec-cpu-down

Fair enough.

> we can skip on panic

Will do.

> however, that means we should register on the cpu to make sure we
> don't miss one going down.

I don't know what you mean?

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs

email: michael:ellerman.id.au
inmsg: mpe:jabber.org
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc64-dev/attachments/20051010/2f5e8006/attachment.pgp