ppc64 oops..
Hugh Dickins
hugh at veritas.com
Wed Nov 16 04:21:06 EST 2005
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> So this was a purely ppc64 bug, not a VM one.
But you're right to be concerned about the loss of that PG_reserved
safety net for initial kernel memory. Like Nick, I would like to do
away with it in the long term; but the kind of bugs we're seeing at
the moment, whether or not they turn out to be caused by those changes,
we do want the safety net back, with a warning to tell when it's being
used (and not clearing PG_reserved in bad_page, but preventing the
page being reused). After a couple of silent releases we can discuss
whether to throw the net away; but it's been silently working for so
long, we've no idea how much might be relying on it.
Hugh
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list