[PATCH 1/4] Memory Add Fixes for ppc64
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Nov 8 08:12:56 EST 2005
> Just curious if we still want to boost MAX_ORDER like this with 64k
> pages? Doesn't that make the MAX_ORDER block size 256MB in this case?
> Also, not quite sure what happens if memory size (a 16 MB multiple)
> does not align with a MAX_ORDER block size (a 256MB multiple in this
> case). My 'guess' is that the page allocator would not use it as it
> would not fit within the buddy system.
>
> cc'ing SPARSEMEM author Andy Whitcroft.
Yes, the MAX_ORDER should be different indeed. But can Kconfig do that ?
That is have the default value be different based on a Kconfig option ?
I don't see that ... We may have to do things differently here...
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list