[U-Boot-Users] RFC: Booting the Linux/ppc64 kernel without Open Firmware HOWTO
Marius Groeger
mgroeger at sysgo.com
Fri May 20 17:11:22 EST 2005
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Ok, I got some numbers here. (I have removed the page alignment
Thanks!
I think we'll just have to try all that out for ourselves. Simple
boards will probably be at the lower end of your figures, which
*should* be fine for most people.
How do you view this, though: couldn't it happen in the future, once
the dev-tree has been widely established, that more and more drivers
are converted to pull their properties off the tree, because it is so
convenient? That *could* lead to rising expectations toward the
firmware, and make what once was a small blob a big blob. Is it
reasonable to assume drivers will #ifdef such behaviour?
Again, I'm just thinking here, no opinions yet. Well, if you want one:
<opinion> Actually I always liked the idea of clever firmware, which
usually knows the underlying hardware best. </opinion>
> - The complete device-tree of my PowerMac laptop (this is _huge_, Apple
> puts a _lot_ of stuff in there, way more than most embedded board even
> the most complex ones will ever need) fits into a 37k blob.
Don't underestimate embedded hardware. The MPC5554 has 286(!)
selectable-priority interrupt sources... :-)
Cheers,
Marius
--
Marius Groeger <mgroeger at sysgo.com>
SYSGO AG Embedded and Real-Time Software
Voice: +49 6136 9948 0 FAX: +49 6136 9948 10
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de | www.pikeos.com
Meet us: Embedded Systems Expo & Conference, Tokyo Big Sight
2005-JUN-29 - 2005-JUL-01 http://www.esec.jp/en/
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list