[PATCH] ppc64 memory_present calls

Dave Hansen haveblue at us.ibm.com
Wed Mar 30 08:57:36 EST 2005

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:53 -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
> > What about the actual memory_present() discontig implementation?  We'll
> > need to push that ahead of sparsemem anyway, so we might as well do them
> > at the same time.
> DISCONTIG seems to work perfectly fine without it.  Do you mean moving 
> some existing discontig code into something called memory_present() or 
> defining memory_present to {} for the discontig case?  If it is the 
> latter we seem pretty well covered by include/linux/mmzone.h

Oh, I guess that ppc64 doesn't have the subarch problem that ia32 does,
and doesn't need to have the discontig setup broken out.  I guess, if it
works, it works.

-- Dave

More information about the Linuxppc64-dev mailing list