CONFIG_NUMA and DISCONTIG inconsistencies
olof at austin.ibm.com
Tue Mar 22 07:12:41 EST 2005
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > If you want to
> > remove it, please do it explicitly under a different patch.
> I actually attached two plain-text patches in that message. They were
> separated when I attached them :)
One patch per email, please. So, separate patch = separate email. And
that means separate patch description, which would have avoided this
chain of emails in the first place.
Anyway, back to your original question:
I think we have machines with discontigous memory (due to I/O holes)
without having NUMA support on the machines, i.e. some POWER3/RS64
Unfortunately I don't have such a machine with sufficient memory
configured to take a look at.
> > How do you expect this to build if you remove ARRAY_INITIALISER?
> Hehe. Minor detail. I think Joel is going to make a more presentable
> (read: compiling) version. I'm sure he'll get that part.
Joel just commented your patch and acked it, with the same build error
in it. I guess that got me confused.
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev