RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:34:57PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Aug 11, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:07:03PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >[snip]
> >
> >>I think this causes confusion.  the reason we suggested pq2 and
> >>classic32 was to handle things like sandpoint.  Sandpoint would live
> >>in classic32.  The confusion partial comes from the fact that we can
> >>run 8240/1/5 on a Sandpoint.  The thinking was everything that was
> >>6xx/7xx/74xx + things like 8240/1/5 which can be thought of as 603 +
> >>10x bridge would be classic32.
> >>
> >
> >Thanks for the explanation.  But I think this is overkill for the
> >sandpoint or true like a sandpoint (Zynx something, Willow, neither of
> >which are in the kernel tree).  I think we can field the "I wanna hack
> >on my Sandpoint/8240, but don't see the code under 82xx/!"  
> >question. :)
> 
> So where do you suggest Sandpoint goes in this directory structure?

classic32/

-- 
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/