eeh
Nathan Fontenot
nfont at austin.ibm.com
Tue Mar 23 04:51:23 EST 2004
I haven't received any comments on this patch. Does anyone have
objections to it going into Ameslab?
thanks.
-Nathan
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 17:49, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> Just wanted to put out an updated version the eeh patch, one that
> I can push to Ameslab. I hope. Thanks to everyone for their
> help in working on this code.
>
> This patch updates a few things.
>
> - The need for rpaphp to be built into the kernel is gone. Code
> was added to let rpaphp register a mechanism with eeh to do the
> disabling of the slot.
>
> - The disable_slot routine is back to static. As Greg pointed
> out, having a routine called disable_slot become a global symbol
> become a global symbol is not a good idea. Especially since this
> is a very arch specific routine.
>
> -Instances of __pa() are replaced with virt_to_phys()
>
> -Moves the slot_errbuf and slot_errbuf_lock off of the stack.
>
> As always, all comments are welcome. thanks.
>
> -Nathan F.
> --
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: eeh.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 8408 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc64-dev/attachments/20040322/c0e36954/attachment.bin
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list