[PATCH] rpaphp broken in ameslab

[Paul Mackerras]

linas at austin.ibm.com writes:

> Look, take this up with the management.  I'm stating the facts.
> There's a half-dozen or dozen or so developers here generating
> patches for the ppc64 tree, and *everyone* (with Hollis as a
> clear exception?) has been operating the same way.  The patches
> go into the sles9 tree, the ppc64 maintainers have the responsibility
> of accepting or refusing the patches and of syncing the trees.

OK, so I haven't been speaking up loudly and clearly and often
enough.  Hollis has got it right.  We'll have to do better in the next
bug frenzy.

Paul.

** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/