extreme RTAS printks
Nathan Lynch
nathanl at austin.ibm.com
Tue Feb 10 15:00:43 EST 2004
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> Could we *please* kill printk_log_rtas()? This data is available via
> /proc files; there is no need to spam our boot logs with it.
How about making it a config option? Patch attached. I'm not sure the
help text is 100% correct - do RAS tools depend on the messages being in
dmesg output or do they look at the /proc files?
Another idea is changing the log level of these messages from KERN_ERR
to something lower priority like KERN_INFO or KERN_DEBUG. At least that
way the console doesn't get spammed in default configurations.
Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rtas_verbose.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1067 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc64-dev/attachments/20040209/4772b6c2/attachment.bin
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list